Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- ...ley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00248.x/pdf The Social Psychology of "Pseudoscience": A Brief History] ''J Theory Social Behav'' 34:267-90 ("The word has asser ...h there is a serious dispute as to whether they may properly be considered pseudoscience.39 KB (6,025 words) - 18:53, 30 April 2024
- 116 bytes (16 words) - 09:10, 10 October 2013
- ...research/articles/02SciencevsPseudoscience.pdf Distinguishing science from pseudoscience online] ...Georges, and Henri Broch. (2004) ''Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis, and Other Pseudoscience'' ISBN 0-8018-7867-52 KB (249 words) - 03:35, 10 July 2008
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 14:15, 13 November 2007
- ...dates back to ancient times (e.g., the writings of [[Lucian]]), the term "pseudoscience" appears to have been used first in 1843 by Magendie, who referred to [[phr5 KB (718 words) - 14:06, 22 March 2009
- ...ww.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos/scienceAndPseudoscience.htm ''Science and Pseudoscience''] - transcript and broadcast of talk by Imre Lakatos4 KB (566 words) - 13:24, 29 November 2007
- 888 bytes (112 words) - 18:38, 29 December 2020
- {{Pseudoscience Subgroup}}26 bytes (2 words) - 17:25, 13 September 2020
Page text matches
- {{Pseudoscience Subgroup}}26 bytes (2 words) - 17:25, 13 September 2020
- #Redirect [[Pseudoscience]]27 bytes (2 words) - 15:00, 28 April 2008
- #Redirect [[Pseudoscience]]27 bytes (2 words) - 15:00, 28 April 2008
- ...research/articles/02SciencevsPseudoscience.pdf Distinguishing science from pseudoscience online] ...Georges, and Henri Broch. (2004) ''Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis, and Other Pseudoscience'' ISBN 0-8018-7867-52 KB (249 words) - 03:35, 10 July 2008
- (1758 -1828) Notorious [[neuroscience|neuroscientist]] who founded the [[pseudoscience]] of [[phrenology]].143 bytes (13 words) - 11:08, 8 December 2008
- ...magician and skeptic, best known as a challenger of paranormal claims and pseudoscience.159 bytes (20 words) - 22:18, 10 September 2009
- A [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] concept, according to which [[water]] [[molecule]]s can209 bytes (27 words) - 11:01, 4 October 2010
- ...nfirm your bias rather than disconfirm them; basis for many instances of [[pseudoscience]].170 bytes (23 words) - 07:42, 3 October 2008
- ...m (heavy hydrogen); widely considered to be [[fringe science|fringe]] or [[pseudoscience]].200 bytes (24 words) - 18:19, 20 September 2008
- ...o come up with criterias and conditions for determining [[science]] from [[pseudoscience]] and non-science.199 bytes (25 words) - 06:02, 15 August 2010
- ...ligence|extra-terrestrial]] constitutes '''ufology'''. A popular form of [[pseudoscience]], this study of UFOs has not produced satisfactory evidence of contact bet364 bytes (47 words) - 13:45, 15 September 2020
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}163 bytes (20 words) - 06:03, 15 August 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}185 bytes (20 words) - 13:45, 15 September 2020
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}118 bytes (14 words) - 17:00, 16 September 2008
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}232 bytes (27 words) - 05:46, 20 February 2024
- {{r|pseudoscience}}162 bytes (19 words) - 11:59, 28 June 2008
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}254 bytes (30 words) - 02:39, 27 June 2012
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}305 bytes (36 words) - 21:34, 31 July 2009
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}387 bytes (47 words) - 11:00, 19 November 2009
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}393 bytes (49 words) - 02:38, 27 June 2012
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}178 bytes (21 words) - 17:03, 25 April 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}155 bytes (18 words) - 23:05, 3 March 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}155 bytes (16 words) - 18:34, 29 December 2020
- {{rpl|Pseudoscience}}613 bytes (69 words) - 21:53, 19 September 2020
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}436 bytes (55 words) - 15:38, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}472 bytes (59 words) - 16:00, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}446 bytes (56 words) - 07:47, 8 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}479 bytes (61 words) - 11:59, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}529 bytes (68 words) - 18:11, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1,000 bytes (115 words) - 13:19, 29 March 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}528 bytes (71 words) - 13:18, 2 February 2023
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}632 bytes (83 words) - 19:35, 11 January 2010
- ...trologers) and shares its controversial status, disregarded by many as a [[pseudoscience]] but seen by others as a valid source of knowledge.657 bytes (103 words) - 17:05, 6 September 2009
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}785 bytes (98 words) - 11:56, 27 November 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}700 bytes (87 words) - 20:33, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}718 bytes (94 words) - 18:10, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}705 bytes (86 words) - 20:58, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}728 bytes (94 words) - 16:34, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1 KB (140 words) - 08:11, 25 January 2011
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1,005 bytes (125 words) - 10:58, 10 July 2012
- ...the same name. The book and column mock – often satirically – purported [[pseudoscience]], and poor media reporting thereof.1 KB (154 words) - 20:44, 13 August 2010
- ...t]] and a [[skepticism|skeptic]] of [[paranormal]], [[supernatural]] and [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] claims whose stage name was "The Amazing Randi". Randi982 bytes (129 words) - 06:15, 28 February 2021
- .../www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos/scienceAndPseudoscience.htm Science and Pseudoscience] - transcript and broadcast of talk by Imre Lakatos1 KB (169 words) - 22:35, 22 January 2008
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1 KB (163 words) - 07:29, 24 April 2024
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1 KB (186 words) - 09:29, 14 November 2011
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1 KB (140 words) - 05:51, 7 November 2010
- ...ur evidence to match your conclusion. It is at the root of many types of [[pseudoscience]] and [[pseudohistory]]. The technique of [[cold reading]], combined with t1 KB (192 words) - 06:09, 15 July 2008
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1 KB (178 words) - 16:08, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Pseudoscience}}1 KB (185 words) - 10:26, 8 April 2023
- ...tp://www.theness.com/articles.asp?id=40 ''Phrenology: History of a Classic Pseudoscience''] - by [[Steven Novella]] MD2 KB (329 words) - 07:33, 1 March 2014
- ...elligent". Human intelligence tests have been ridiculed as [[Pseudoscience|pseudoscience]], and intelligence tests for dogs are nothing if not more suspect.4 KB (753 words) - 01:05, 23 November 2009
- ...in discrete parts of the brain, and is famous for founding the notorious [[pseudoscience]] of [[phrenology]]. That fact is unfortunate for his reputation, as he als2 KB (344 words) - 11:43, 8 June 2009
- ...ww.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos/scienceAndPseudoscience.htm ''Science and Pseudoscience''] - transcript and broadcast of talk by Imre Lakatos4 KB (566 words) - 13:24, 29 November 2007
- ...tle, best known for promoting intelligent design (ID), widely considered a pseudoscience. Founded by Bruce Chapman, a former Ronald Reagan|Reagan appointee in a var3 KB (486 words) - 01:55, 27 March 2024
- ...n developed within the Russian space research program<!-- and qualified as pseudoscience by some authors.!-->.3 KB (490 words) - 07:30, 18 March 2024
- ...pseudoscientific fad,<ref>Lin, Zixin (2000). ''Qigong: Chinese medicine or pseudoscience'' Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-57392-232-6</ref>, but other pu5 KB (700 words) - 10:12, 28 February 2024
- ...ley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00248.x/pdf The Social Psychology of "Pseudoscience": A Brief History] ''J Theory Social Behav'' 34:267-90 ("The word has asser ...h there is a serious dispute as to whether they may properly be considered pseudoscience.39 KB (6,025 words) - 18:53, 30 April 2024
- ...dates back to ancient times (e.g., the writings of [[Lucian]]), the term "pseudoscience" appears to have been used first in 1843 by Magendie, who referred to [[phr5 KB (718 words) - 14:06, 22 March 2009
- ...pseudoscience&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google Books preview]. | Homeopathy as pseudoscience, quakery, and cult. '''On Homeopathy as pseudoscience as argued by an eminent biologist'''15 KB (2,208 words) - 07:23, 27 November 2010
- ...the reason psychoanalysis is sometimes considered prescientific, or even [[pseudoscience]], is the much greater modern understanding of [[neuroscience]]s. Neverthe6 KB (883 words) - 10:01, 6 January 2011
- ...ion and education about genetic conditions to potential parents from the [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] coercion of reproductive choice that had been imposed by7 KB (1,131 words) - 00:39, 20 October 2013
- ...discussion recently on this - the subject title mentions Ormus, a piece of pseudoscience about which there was briefly an article, now deleted - the suggestion was8 KB (1,275 words) - 11:01, 22 May 2010
- ...tific community, however, almost universally considers astrology to be a [[pseudoscience]] or superstition, and there is no widely accepted scientific evidence for8 KB (1,250 words) - 09:14, 10 January 2021
- ===Pseudoscience===23 KB (3,560 words) - 17:18, 3 April 2010
- '''Phrenology''' is the formal [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] practice of assigning [[personality]] traits to individu8 KB (1,298 words) - 14:23, 30 December 2020
- ...hing you need to know (and you look for) is: what is a fractal? Same for [[pseudoscience]] in my view. ...discussion takes place on [[Talk:Pseudoscience#Definition of Pseudoscience|Pseudoscience talk page]]. Should we move it here? --[[User:Aleksander Halicz|Alex Halicz66 KB (10,879 words) - 17:02, 5 March 2024
- ...reasons, making no scientific claims, are not strictly speaking guilty of pseudoscience. ...an Association for the Advancement of Science]], think creation science is pseudoscience, pointing to the wide acceptance of evolution within the scientific communi26 KB (3,971 words) - 04:23, 12 June 2023
- ...tific community, however, almost universally considers astrology to be a [[pseudoscience]] or superstition, and there is no widely accepted scientific evidence for12 KB (1,829 words) - 10:07, 10 January 2021
- Wikipedia has a similar policy on pseudoscience, but with stronger language than us. Now their neutrality policy is often e ==Pseudoscience==56 KB (8,977 words) - 15:00, 20 March 2024
- ...motes have been criticized by some medical and scientific professionals as pseudoscience. This criticism has been described as ranging "from the dismissive to...dam13 KB (1,984 words) - 10:34, 14 March 2023
- Interestingly, many examples of [[pseudoscience]] are often described by their originators and promoters as just a forthcom16 KB (2,443 words) - 13:39, 25 January 2011
- ...tudies with all the trappings of real science, but which are nonetheless [[pseudoscience]] and unworthy of either respect or support.13 KB (2,038 words) - 04:35, 26 October 2013
- ...ntors. Numerous [[Perpetual motion machine|perpetual motion]] and other [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] devices, often called [[Zero-point_energy#.22Free_energy16 KB (2,522 words) - 14:33, 14 May 2023
- ...onal Chinese Medicine]] (TCM), which some scholars have characterized as [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]]. See [[Acupuncture#Criticism_of_TCM_theory|Acupuncture:16 KB (2,486 words) - 08:37, 17 September 2020
- ...entific fraud investigator and chemist Walter Stewart, and "professional [[pseudoscience]] debunker" [[James Randi]]. With the cooperation of Benveniste's team, un18 KB (2,650 words) - 03:19, 25 June 2019
- This factoid enabled [[pseudoscience|pseudo-scientific]] "scholars" such as John Major Jenkins, who drew attenti24 KB (3,716 words) - 15:07, 18 March 2024
- ...ince cited cold fusion as an example of either irreproducible science or [[pseudoscience]].<ref>Park R (2000) ''Voodoo Science'' Oxford University Press: New York,27 KB (4,108 words) - 00:45, 8 October 2013
- ...elationship to generally-accepted mathematics is similar to that between [[pseudoscience]] and real science. The misconceptions involved are normally based on:30 KB (4,289 words) - 16:03, 20 January 2023
- ...him to criticise both [[psychoanalysis]] and contemporary [[Marxism]] as [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]], on the basis that their theories are not falsifiable. P31 KB (4,648 words) - 05:07, 26 October 2013
- ...a definition is expected to simplify the distinguishing of science from [[pseudoscience]], rejecting all the projects of the30 KB (4,465 words) - 11:44, 2 February 2023
- ...have been criticised by scientists and psychologists, and been branded as pseudoscience. ''Dianetics'' introduced the idea of auditing, the counselling process tha31 KB (4,692 words) - 14:31, 19 March 2023
- ...theory. The perverse retention of falsified theories might be considered [[pseudoscience| unscientific]]; but this is the case whether the perversely retained theor30 KB (4,597 words) - 01:37, 29 October 2013
- ...vived. In his 1905 autobiography, he explained, in the termniology of the pseudoscience, [[Phrenology|phrenology]] — a popular 'science' then and persisting35 KB (5,496 words) - 21:48, 13 December 2011
- ..., or be outside them - e.g. Jesus, Intelligent Design, Scientific Method, Pseudoscience, and those with political overtones where neutrality is about tone as much51 KB (8,532 words) - 12:14, 13 March 2024
- ...nge much, but I can see how a controversial subject such as acupuncture or pseudoscience could end up going through some long discussions without making significant96 KB (16,369 words) - 10:49, 7 March 2024
- ...for the term "Cryptobiology"; the closest matches involve cryptozoology, a pseudoscience that seems little related to cryobiology. Should I get rid of it? Or is it111 KB (18,395 words) - 05:14, 7 March 2024