Nazi regeneration and transplantation experiments: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{subpages}} <!-- Text is transcluded from the BASEPAGENAME/Definition subpage-->)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
<!-- Text is transcluded from the BASEPAGENAME/Definition subpage-->
'''Nazi regeneration and transplantation experiments''' which were ''called "bone, muscle, and nerve regeneration, and bone transplant" in the indictment'', were  conducted for thhe benefit of German armed forces, using Polish inmates at the [[Ravensbrueck Concentration Camp]], (September 1942-December 1943).
 
While many of the experiments had little scientific basis, this was highly questionable even in the 1940s, when basic blood typing and transfusion were known. Bone, muscle, and nerve apparently were treated purely as a surgical problem; immunologic tissue matching was not done, and immunosuppression was not yet known. Some of the procedures made no anatomic sense.
 
In the [[Medical Case (NMT)]]  [[Karl Brandt]], [[Rudolf Brandt]], [[Fritz Fischer]], [[Karl Gebhardt]], [[Siegfried Handloser]], [[Herta Oberheuser]], and [[Paul Rostock]] were charged.
 
The  against Rudolf Brandt was withdrawn. Karl Brandt, Handloser, and Rostock were acquitted; Fischer, Gebhardt, and Oberheuser were convicted.

Revision as of 11:18, 24 November 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Nazi regeneration and transplantation experiments which were called "bone, muscle, and nerve regeneration, and bone transplant" in the indictment, were conducted for thhe benefit of German armed forces, using Polish inmates at the Ravensbrueck Concentration Camp, (September 1942-December 1943).

While many of the experiments had little scientific basis, this was highly questionable even in the 1940s, when basic blood typing and transfusion were known. Bone, muscle, and nerve apparently were treated purely as a surgical problem; immunologic tissue matching was not done, and immunosuppression was not yet known. Some of the procedures made no anatomic sense.

In the Medical Case (NMT) Karl Brandt, Rudolf Brandt, Fritz Fischer, Karl Gebhardt, Siegfried Handloser, Herta Oberheuser, and Paul Rostock were charged.

The against Rudolf Brandt was withdrawn. Karl Brandt, Handloser, and Rostock were acquitted; Fischer, Gebhardt, and Oberheuser were convicted.