Search results

{{r|History of computing}}

<!-- that we need to mention somehow in the [[history of computing]] article (which is currently organized as a timeline not amenable to inclu

...r science in [[computer science]] that we need to mention somehow in the [[history of computing]] article (which is currently organized as a timeline not amenable to inclu

...into here. It's a mess right now, and some of it may belong instead in [[history of computing]]. But it fits here, for the moment, better than in [[Computers]], which i

| publisher=History of Computing

::Just an overview here...there should, I think, be a separate article on History of Computing or some such[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 00:20, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

...exist, and they are used for so many different kinds of activities. The [[history of computing]] is very complex and thus deserves its own article. ..., their work built on that of earlier mathematicians as described in the [[history of computing]].

...sending most of the old stuff either to [[Computer architecture]] or to [[History of computing]] (new article).[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 17:14, 23 April 2007 (CDT) ...out technology, however. Perhaps that discussion would belong better in [[history of computing]], which hopefully will have a breakdown of developments by decade.[[User:P

| publisher=History of Computing

...n Hollerith''' was an American engineer and businessman important in the [[history of computing]] for having invented [[punch card|punched card]] input for program instruc

...kthroughs in [[computer science]] that we need to mention somehow in the [[history of computing]] article (which is currently organized as a timeline not amenable to inclu

:* [[History of computing]]

Part of this belongs in [[history of computing]].

* Because "History of computing" is a potentially enormous topic, I'd like to organize this article in chro |align="center" colspan="6" width=100%|History of Computing Timeline

...esktop PC. I'm not sure whether a discussion of that belongs here or in [[history of computing]], or if it's worth addressing at all. These are malleable terms that get

::Or should it be [[History of computing]]? [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 15:16, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

==history of computing== ==too much Babbage on "history of computing"; can we move stuff to "Charles Babbage" instead?==

* History of Computing ...ng systems]], that can be pointed at both by this article, and also from [[history of computing]]?[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 10:52, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

==history of computing== We are starting work on [[history of computing]], and if no one objects, I might move the history part of this somewhere t

* [[History of computing]] (Additional information, some clean up and restructuring)