Archive:New Draft of the Week: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen (We need more suggestions!) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| <!-- article --> [[ | | <!-- article --> [[Debt]] | ||
| <!-- score --> 1 | | <!-- score --> 1 | ||
| <!-- supporters --> [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] | | <!-- supporters --> --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 23:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- specialist supporters --> | | <!-- specialist supporters --> | ||
| <!-- date created --> | | <!-- date created --> June 9, 2010 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
== View Current Transcluded Nominees (after they have been transcluded by an Administrator) == | == View Current Transcluded Nominees (after they have been transcluded by an Administrator) == | ||
The next New Draft of the Week will be the article with the most votes at 1 AM UTC on Thursday, | The next New Draft of the Week will be the article with the most votes at 1 AM UTC on Thursday, 1 July, 2010. | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
{{Featured Article Candidate | {{Featured Article Candidate | ||
| article = | | article = Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript | ||
| supporters = [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 13:12, 1 | | supporters = [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 13:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| specialists = | | specialists = | ||
| created = | | created = 22 April 2010 | ||
| score = | | score = 1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
Do not edit anything else -- the following line changes the Welcome page automatically. | Do not edit anything else -- the following line changes the Welcome page automatically. | ||
--> | --> | ||
<onlyinclude>{{Featured Article| | <onlyinclude>{{Featured Article|Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript}}</onlyinclude> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Move previous winner articles to the next section | Move previous winner articles to the next section | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
<div style="height:25em; overflow:auto; background:#f9f9f9; border:1px solid #aaa;"> | <div style="height:25em; overflow:auto; background:#f9f9f9; border:1px solid #aaa;"> | ||
{{rpr|Ellipse}} | |||
{{rpr|Aeneid}} | {{rpr|Aeneid}} | ||
{{rpr|Tall tale}} | {{rpr|Tall tale}} |
Revision as of 17:55, 18 June 2010
The New Draft of the Week is a chance to highlight a recently created Citizendium article that has just started down the road of becoming a Citizendium masterpiece.
It is chosen each week by vote in a manner similar to that of its sister project, the Article of the Week.
Add New Nominees Here
To add a new nominee or vote for an existing nominee, click edit for this section and follow the instructions Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript Ellipse
Nominated article | Vote Score |
Supporters | Specialist supporters | Date created |
---|---|---|---|---|
Debt | 1 | --Daniel Mietchen 23:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | June 9, 2010 |
If you want to see how these nominees will look on the CZ home page (if selected as a winner), scroll down a little bit.
Transclusion of the above nominees (to be done by an Administrator)
- Transclude each of the nominees in the above "Table of Nominee" as per the instructions at Template:Featured Article Candidate.
- Then add the transcluded article to the list in the next section below, using the {{Featured Article Candidate}} template.
View Current Transcluded Nominees (after they have been transcluded by an Administrator)
The next New Draft of the Week will be the article with the most votes at 1 AM UTC on Thursday, 1 July, 2010.
Nominated article | Supporters | Specialist supporters | Dates | Score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript: Early 15th century illuminated manuscript of Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales. [e]
The Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript, also Ellesmere Chaucer or Ellesmere manuscript, is an early 15th century illuminated manuscript of Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales. It is part of the Ellesmere manuscripts and referred to as MS EL 26 C 9. Together with the Hengwrt Chaucer manuscript, it is considered to be the most important source of the original text of The Canterbury Tales. The Ellesmere Chaucer is held in the Huntington Library in San Marino, California (U.S. state). It is named after its former owner, the Earl of Ellesmere. Significance of the Ellesmere ChaucerThe Ellesmere Chaucer is one of the oldest surviving manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales. It was copied in the years following Chaucer's death in 1400, according to some in 1401, [1] to others around 1410.[2] Since no holograph of Chaucer has ever been found, it offers the best evidence of what he wrote. History of the manuscriptThe early history of the Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript is uncertain, but it is possible that soon after Chaucer's death in 1400, his son Thomas commissioned a deluxe manuscript of The Canterbury Tales, and provided the materials to produce it. [4] Over a large period of time names were recorded in the manuscript, which implies that it must have had several owners. The following is a reconstruction of that ownership with the use of the most important of those glosses. House de VereSince a ballad on the House of Vere is included at the beginning of the manuscript, an early association with John de Vere (1408-1462), 12th Earl of Oxford is probable. After the death of his father in 1417, he became ward of the Duke of Exeter, and in 1426 of the Duke of Bedford, both kinsmen of Thomas Chaucer. Drury FamilyFrom 1513 on the manuscript seems to have been in the possession of the Drury family.
This gloss refers to Sir Robert Drury of Hawsted in Suffolk, his two sons William and Robert, and his three daughters, Anna, Bridget and Ursula. In 1495 Sir Drury had been speaker of the House of Commons and he was also a member of Henry VIII's Council. Anna Drury was married to George Waldegrave, and after Waldegrave's death in 1528 to Sir Thomas Jermyn. Bridget Drury was married to Sir John Jernyngham of Somerleyton and Ursula Drury was married to Sir Giles Alington. The names Domina Jernegan and Domina Alington are repeated in the manuscript. The gloss "Edwarde Waldegrave" probably refers to George Waldegrave's and Anne Drury's son, who was born in 1514.
This could be Henry Payne of Nowton, near Hawstead, a member of 'The Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn', who died in 1568. He had witnessed Sir William Drury's will in 1557 and had gotten a legacy from him. In his own will, he bequeathed the manuscript to Sir Giles Alington, the grandson of Ursula Drury and her husband Giles Alington.
This gloss gives us the date 1568 and the motto "Durum pati" of Roger North (1530/31-1600), 2nd Lord North, the new owner of the manuscript, although it is not known how it came into his possession. Some verses were added to the manuscript, signed with 'R.N.' or 'R. North'. [2] The Bridgewater LibraryAfter the death of Lord North in 1600, the manuscript came into the possession of John Egerton (1579-1649), who was created 1st Earl of Bridgewater in 1617. He added the pressmark "Q3" to the manuscript. John Egerton (1622-1696), 2nd Earl of Bridgewater corrected that later to "Q.3/3". The manuscript became part of the Bridgewater library and was housed at Ashridge in Hertford, where it would stay until 1802. It was then moved to London. A year later Francis Egerton (1736-1803), 6th Earl and 3rd Duke of Bridgewater died unmarried. His distant cousin, John William Egerton (1753-1823), inherited the earldom of Bridgewater and the Ashridge lands. His nephew, George Granville Leveson-Gower, 2nd Marquis of Stafford (later 1st Duke of Sutherland), inherited the Bridgewater library and other properties including Bridgewater House in London. From 1803 to 1833 the manuscript was called the Stafford Chaucer. Leveson-Gower’s younger son, Francis Egerton, created Earl of Ellesmere in 1846, inherited the library and the Stafford Chaucer became the Ellesmere Chaucer. The library remained in the family until it was sold by John Francis Granville Scrope Egerton (1872-1944), 4th Earl of Ellesmere. [2] Henry E. Huntington and the Huntington LibraryIn 1917, Henry Edwards Huntington, railroad magnate and collector of art and rare books, purchased the Bridgewater library privately from Sotheby's. That makes him the last private owner of the manuscript that is now known as the Ellesmere Chaucer. After Huntington's death in 1927, his priceless library of rare books and art was opened to the public. Description of the manuscriptThe beautiful, large manuscript, probably made and bound in London, is approximately four hundred by two hundred eighty-four millimetres in size. It contains two hundred and forty fine vellum leaves, two hundred thirty-two of which contain the text of The Canterbury Tales. It is written in an anglicana formata script [5] by the scribe who also copied the Hengwrt Chaucer manuscript. In 2004 this scribe has been tentatively identified as Adam Pinkhurst. The remaining leaves contain verses, notes and scribbles by various persons. It is luxuriously illuminated and by far the most famous survivor of the rare illustrated versions of Chaucer's major works. In circa 1911 it was bound in dark green morocco, with the Egerton arms stamped in gold on the front cover. [6] In 1994 the previous modern green goatskin binding of the manuscript was removed and in 1995 the manuscript was re-bound, using original 15th-century techniques. [2] The illuminationAfter the text was copied [7] it was surrounded by decorated borders of floral patterns in a conservative style. [6] Smaller gold initials are two to four lines high and have white patterns on particoloured blue and pink grounds. The portraits of the pilgrimsA unique feature of the Ellesmere Chaucer is the set of twenty-three equestrian portraits of the pilgrims. Along with some symbolism - the Clerk with books, the Physician with a urine bottle - some replicate many of the details of the descriptions given in the General Prologue and the links between the tales. [9] Even the horses suit their riders, at least to some extent. Pilgrim Chaucer's portraitThe portrait of pilgrim Chaucer, [10] the pilgrim that records all the tales, is painted by the most competent of the three artists that worked on the Ellesmere Chaucer. There is some discrepancy in proportion between the large bust of pilgrim Chaucer and the smaller size of his legs and his horse, standing on a grassy plot. It marks the opening of his The Tale of Melibee. This bearded portrait of Geoffrey bears a marked resemblance to the image appearing in a British Library manuscript of Thomas Hoccleve's poem The Regiments of Princes. (MS Harley 4866). [11] That picture [12] accompanies a eulogy of Chaucer and is descibed by Hoccleve as a lyknesse that will serve to remind readers of what Chaucer looked like. [13] The order of the talesThe Ellesmere and Hengwrt Chaucer manuscripts share the same scribe. Pinkhurst appears to have copied the Hengwrt Chaucer first, maybe from Chaucer's originals and possibly during his lifetime. He then copied the Ellesmere manuscript after a more careful inventory and editorial preparation.
The Ellesmere Chaucer fascimileIn commemoration of its 75th anniversary, the Huntington Library authorized Yushodo Co. in Tokyo to publish a facsimile of the Ellesmere Chaucer. This facsimile was printed in a full-color, high-definition process with gold inlay, on high quality, long-life paper imported from England. The original camera work was done at the Huntington Library by the Huntington's principle photographer, Robert Schlosser. The manuscript was conserved and rebound by Anthony G. Cains of the Trinity College, Dublin, with the assistance of Maria Fredericks, at the time Rare Book Conservator of the Huntington Library. This is truly an international work, bringing together the expertise of all participants to produce one magnificent facsimile. [4] This fascimile was produced in a limited edition of 250 copies:
The Ellesmere Chaucer Monochromatic Facsimile Sources and references
|
Daniel Mietchen 13:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC) | 1
|
Current Winner
To be selected and implemented by an Administrator. To change, click edit and follow the instructions, or see documentation at {{Featured Article}}.
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
The Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript, also Ellesmere Chaucer or Ellesmere manuscript, is an early 15th century illuminated manuscript of Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales. It is part of the Ellesmere manuscripts and referred to as MS EL 26 C 9. Together with the Hengwrt Chaucer manuscript, it is considered to be the most important source of the original text of The Canterbury Tales. The Ellesmere Chaucer is held in the Huntington Library in San Marino, California (U.S. state). It is named after its former owner, the Earl of Ellesmere.
Significance of the Ellesmere Chaucer
The Ellesmere Chaucer is one of the oldest surviving manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales. It was copied in the years following Chaucer's death in 1400, according to some in 1401, [1] to others around 1410.[2] Since no holograph of Chaucer has ever been found, it offers the best evidence of what he wrote.
Still it was only with the publication of Walter W. Skeat's edition of the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer in 1894, that the Ellesmere Chaucer gained its eminent textual status. After Skeat many editions were based on the Ellesmere Chaucer, including the Riverside Chaucer in 1987. Other editions were based on the Hengwrt Chaucer manuscript. In fact, no matter which of these is chosen, the other one is heavily consulted. [3]
History of the manuscript
The early history of the Ellesmere Chaucer manuscript is uncertain, but it is possible that soon after Chaucer's death in 1400, his son Thomas commissioned a deluxe manuscript of The Canterbury Tales, and provided the materials to produce it. [4] Over a large period of time names were recorded in the manuscript, which implies that it must have had several owners. The following is a reconstruction of that ownership with the use of the most important of those glosses.
House de Vere
Since a ballad on the House of Vere is included at the beginning of the manuscript, an early association with John de Vere (1408-1462), 12th Earl of Oxford is probable. After the death of his father in 1417, he became ward of the Duke of Exeter, and in 1426 of the Duke of Bedford, both kinsmen of Thomas Chaucer.
At the time of death of John de Vere (1442-1513), 13th Earl of Oxford, Sir Robert Drury was one of the executors of the will and among the legatees were Sir Drury's sons-in-law, George Waldegrave and Sir Giles Alington. [2]
Drury Family
From 1513 on the manuscript seems to have been in the possession of the Drury family.
- “Robertus drury miles [space], William drury miles, Robertus drury miles, domina Jarmin, domina Jarningam, dommina Alington,”
This gloss refers to Sir Robert Drury of Hawsted in Suffolk, his two sons William and Robert, and his three daughters, Anna, Bridget and Ursula. In 1495 Sir Drury had been speaker of the House of Commons and he was also a member of Henry VIII's Council. Anna Drury was married to George Waldegrave, and after Waldegrave's death in 1528 to Sir Thomas Jermyn. Bridget Drury was married to Sir John Jernyngham of Somerleyton and Ursula Drury was married to Sir Giles Alington. The names Domina Jernegan and Domina Alington are repeated in the manuscript. The gloss "Edwarde Waldegrave" probably refers to George Waldegrave's and Anne Drury's son, who was born in 1514.
- "... per me henricum Payne" "And also my Chaucer written in vellum and illumyned with golde."
This could be Henry Payne of Nowton, near Hawstead, a member of 'The Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn', who died in 1568. He had witnessed Sir William Drury's will in 1557 and had gotten a legacy from him. In his own will, he bequeathed the manuscript to Sir Giles Alington, the grandson of Ursula Drury and her husband Giles Alington.
- "1 Durum 5 Pati 68 R. North"
This gloss gives us the date 1568 and the motto "Durum pati" of Roger North (1530/31-1600), 2nd Lord North, the new owner of the manuscript, although it is not known how it came into his possession. Some verses were added to the manuscript, signed with 'R.N.' or 'R. North'. [2]
The Bridgewater Library
After the death of Lord North in 1600, the manuscript came into the possession of John Egerton (1579-1649), who was created 1st Earl of Bridgewater in 1617. He added the pressmark "Q3" to the manuscript. John Egerton (1622-1696), 2nd Earl of Bridgewater corrected that later to "Q.3/3". The manuscript became part of the Bridgewater library and was housed at Ashridge in Hertford, where it would stay until 1802. It was then moved to London. A year later Francis Egerton (1736-1803), 6th Earl and 3rd Duke of Bridgewater died unmarried. His distant cousin, John William Egerton (1753-1823), inherited the earldom of Bridgewater and the Ashridge lands. His nephew, George Granville Leveson-Gower, 2nd Marquis of Stafford (later 1st Duke of Sutherland), inherited the Bridgewater library and other properties including Bridgewater House in London. From 1803 to 1833 the manuscript was called the Stafford Chaucer. Leveson-Gower’s younger son, Francis Egerton, created Earl of Ellesmere in 1846, inherited the library and the Stafford Chaucer became the Ellesmere Chaucer. The library remained in the family until it was sold by John Francis Granville Scrope Egerton (1872-1944), 4th Earl of Ellesmere. [2]
Henry E. Huntington and the Huntington Library
In 1917, Henry Edwards Huntington, railroad magnate and collector of art and rare books, purchased the Bridgewater library privately from Sotheby's. That makes him the last private owner of the manuscript that is now known as the Ellesmere Chaucer. After Huntington's death in 1927, his priceless library of rare books and art was opened to the public.
Description of the manuscript
The beautiful, large manuscript, probably made and bound in London, is approximately four hundred by two hundred eighty-four millimetres in size. It contains two hundred and forty fine vellum leaves, two hundred thirty-two of which contain the text of The Canterbury Tales. It is written in an anglicana formata script [5] by the scribe who also copied the Hengwrt Chaucer manuscript. In 2004 this scribe has been tentatively identified as Adam Pinkhurst. The remaining leaves contain verses, notes and scribbles by various persons. It is luxuriously illuminated and by far the most famous survivor of the rare illustrated versions of Chaucer's major works. In circa 1911 it was bound in dark green morocco, with the Egerton arms stamped in gold on the front cover. [6] In 1994 the previous modern green goatskin binding of the manuscript was removed and in 1995 the manuscript was re-bound, using original 15th-century techniques. [2]
The illumination
After the text was copied [7] it was surrounded by decorated borders of floral patterns in a conservative style. [6]
The white-highlighted initials on a gold ground in blue, pink, dull red, and with little or no green, are six to four lines high. They are filled with leaf designs, with bars and foliage borders in the same colours, including daisy buds, interlaced and with an occasional grotesque.
Smaller gold initials are two to four lines high and have white patterns on particoloured blue and pink grounds.
Paragraph marks are alternating in blue with red or in gold with grey-blue flourishing and further in the text in gold with purple. Running headlines and marginal notes are set off by these paragraph marks. [2]
Verse paragraph breaks are identified by the term 'pausacio'. [8]
The portraits of the pilgrims
A unique feature of the Ellesmere Chaucer is the set of twenty-three equestrian portraits of the pilgrims. Along with some symbolism - the Clerk with books, the Physician with a urine bottle - some replicate many of the details of the descriptions given in the General Prologue and the links between the tales. [9] Even the horses suit their riders, at least to some extent.
Each portrait is positioned at the start of his or her tale and placed outside of the written space. On the recto the illuminations are on the right of the text in the gloss space or in the ruled texts space. On the verso they are usually to the left of the text in a niche in the decoration, except for the portrait of the Miller, which is also pictured on the right of the text.
The portraits vary in size, the largest being circa hundred by eighty millimetres, the smallest circa forty-five by forty-five millimetres according to the artist.
There were three different artists at work. One painted the first sixteen pilgrims and the last one as small figures. A second one painted only Chaucer's portrait. A third one was responsible for the illustrations of the Monk, the Nun's Priest, the Second Nun, the Canon's Yeoman and the Manciple. He painted his figures on a larger scale en made them standing on a patch of green grass.
Some miniatures seem to be done before the border decoration was painted, and forced the bar border and initial to the right of their normal position. Others were painted after the border. Then erasure of parts of the border was needed. [2]
Pilgrim Chaucer's portrait
The portrait of pilgrim Chaucer, [10] the pilgrim that records all the tales, is painted by the most competent of the three artists that worked on the Ellesmere Chaucer. There is some discrepancy in proportion between the large bust of pilgrim Chaucer and the smaller size of his legs and his horse, standing on a grassy plot. It marks the opening of his The Tale of Melibee. This bearded portrait of Geoffrey bears a marked resemblance to the image appearing in a British Library manuscript of Thomas Hoccleve's poem The Regiments of Princes. (MS Harley 4866). [11] That picture [12] accompanies a eulogy of Chaucer and is descibed by Hoccleve as a lyknesse that will serve to remind readers of what Chaucer looked like. [13]
The order of the tales
The Ellesmere and Hengwrt Chaucer manuscripts share the same scribe. Pinkhurst appears to have copied the Hengwrt Chaucer first, maybe from Chaucer's originals and possibly during his lifetime. He then copied the Ellesmere manuscript after a more careful inventory and editorial preparation.
Academics divide the tales into ten fragments. The tales in a fragment are connected, and give a clear indication of their order, usually with one character that passes the floor to another. Between the fragments themselves there are no explicit connections, save for IX-X and, in the Ellesmere manuscript, IV-V. This means that there is no explicit indication of the order in which Chaucer intended the fragments to be read. The order of the tales in the Hengwrt and the Ellesmere manuscripts differs. The order of the Ellesmere Chaucer, also the most popular one and used in The Riverside Chaucer, is as follows:
Fragment | Tales |
---|---|
I (A) | General Prologue The Knight's Tale The Miller's Prologue and Tale The Reeve's Prologue and Tale The Cook's Prologue and Tale |
II (B1) | The Man of Law's Introduction, Prologue, Tale and Epilogue |
III (D) | The Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale The Friar's Prologue and Tale The Summoner's Prologue and Tale |
IV (E) | The Clerk's Prologue and Tale The Merchant's Prologue, Tale and Epilogue |
V (F) | The Squire's Introduction and Tale The Franklin's Prologue and Tale |
VI (C) | The Physician's Tale The Pardoner's Introduction, Prologue and Tale |
VII (B2) | The Shipman's Tale The Prioress's Prologue and Tale The Prologue and Tale of Sir Thopas The Tale of Milibee The Monk's Prologue and Tale The Nun's Priest's Prologue, Tale and Epilogue |
VIII (G) | The Second Nun's Prologue and Tale The Canon's Yeoman's Prologue and Tale |
IX (H) | The Manciple's Prologue and Tale |
X (I) | The Parson's Prologue and Tale Chaucer's Retraction |
The Ellesmere Chaucer fascimile
In commemoration of its 75th anniversary, the Huntington Library authorized Yushodo Co. in Tokyo to publish a facsimile of the Ellesmere Chaucer. This facsimile was printed in a full-color, high-definition process with gold inlay, on high quality, long-life paper imported from England. The original camera work was done at the Huntington Library by the Huntington's principle photographer, Robert Schlosser. The manuscript was conserved and rebound by Anthony G. Cains of the Trinity College, Dublin, with the assistance of Maria Fredericks, at the time Rare Book Conservator of the Huntington Library. This is truly an international work, bringing together the expertise of all participants to produce one magnificent facsimile. [4]
This fascimile was produced in a limited edition of 250 copies:
- the Deluxe version, sewn and bound in an early 15th-century-type binding, oak boards and quarter brown calf leather, with blue quarter morocco clamshell case,
- the Quired version of unsewn leaves in a blue quarter morocco clamshell case.
The Ellesmere Chaucer Monochromatic Facsimile
The transparencies that were the basis of the color facsimile were used to make a full-sized, monochromatic facsimile, printed by the Stinehour Press of Lunenberg, Vermont. The facsimile exibits the texture and decoration of the original manuscript pages. It features a color frontispiece, the page that begins the Knight's Tale. The New Ellemere Chaucer Facimile was released in 1996.
Sources and references
- The Riverside Chaucer Third Edition (1987), General Editor Larry D. Benson, Harvard University, Houghton Mufflin Company, Boston. ISBN 0-395-29031-7
- Ellesmere Chaucer - Guide to Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the Huntington Library.
- Ruth Evans, "Chaucer's life", in: Steve Ellis Chaucer An Oxford Guide (2005). New York United States: Oxford University Press. Inc. ISBN 0-19-925912-7
- David Griffith, "Visual culture", in: Steve Ellis Chaucer An Oxford Guide (2005). New York United States: Oxford University Press. Inc. ISBN 0-19-925912-7
- Stephen Penn, "Literacy and literary production", in: Steve Ellis Chaucer An Oxford Guide (2005). New York United States: Oxford University Press. Inc. ISBN 0-19-925912-7
- Elizabeth Scala, "Editing Chaucer", in: Steve Ellis Chaucer An Oxford Guide (2005). New York United States: Oxford University Press. Inc. ISBN 0-19-925912-7
- ↑ Evans, p. 21.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Ellesmere Chaucer.
- ↑ Scala, p. 485.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Scala, p. 491.
- ↑ anglicana formata script
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Huntington Catalog Images
- ↑ Penn, p. 125
- ↑ Penn, p. 119.
- ↑ Griffith, p. 201.
- ↑ Portrait of Chaucer in the Ellesmere Chaucer.
- ↑ Griffith, p. 205.
- ↑ Geoffrey Chaucer's portrait in MS Harley 4866.
- ↑ Evans, p. 21.
- ↑ Ellesmere Chaucer
- ↑ Riverside, p. 5.
Previous Winners
- Ellipse [r]: Planar curve formed by the points whose distances to two given points add up to a given number. [e]
- Aeneid [r]: An epic poem written by Virgil, which depicts the hero Aeneas fleeing from Troy (ancient city), journeying to Carthage, Sicily, and finally to Italy where after battling, he becomes the precursor of the city of Rome; a monumental work of major significance in Western literature. [e]
- Tall tale [r]: A narrative, song or jest, transmitted orally or in writing, presenting an incredible, boastful or impossible story. [e]
- Plane (geometry) [r]: In elementary geometry, a flat surface that entirely contains all straight lines passing through two of its points. [e]
- Steam [r]: The vapor (or gaseous) phase of water (H2O). [e]
- Wasan [r]: Classical Japanese mathematics that flourished during the Edo Period from the 17th to mid-19th centuries. [e]
- Racism in Australia [r]: The history of racism and restrictive immigration policies in the Commonwealth of Australia. [e]
- Think tank [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Les Paul [r]: (9 June 1915 – 13 August 2009) American innovator, inventor, musician and songwriter, who was notably a pioneer in the development of the solid-body electric guitar. [e]
- Zionism [r]: The ideology that Jews should form a Jewish state in what is traced as the Biblical area of Palestine; there are many interpretations, including the boundaries of such a state and its criteria for citizenship [e] (September 3)
- Earth's atmosphere [r]: An envelope of gas that surrounds the Earth and extends from the Earth's surface out thousands of kilometres, becoming increasingly thinner (less dense) with distance but always held in place by Earth's gravitational pull. [e] (August 27)
- Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain [r]: U.S. educator deeply bonded to Bowdoin College, from undergraduate to President; American Civil War general and recipient of the Medal of Honor; Governor of Maine [e] (August 20)
- The Sporting Life (album) [r]: A 1994 studio album recorded by Diamanda Galás and John Paul Jones. [e] (August 13}
- The Rolling Stones [r]: Famous and influential English blues rock group formed in 1962, known for their albums Let It Bleed and Sticky Fingers, and songs '(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction' and 'Start Me Up'. [e] (August 5)
- Euler angles [r]: three rotation angles that describe any rotation of a 3-dimensional object. [e] (July 30)
- Chester Nimitz [r]: United States Navy admiral (1885-1966) who was Commander in Chief, Pacific and Pacific Ocean Areas in World War II [e] (July 23)
- Heat [r]: A form of energy that flows spontaneously from hotter to colder bodies that are in thermal contact. [e] (July 16)
- Continuum hypothesis [r]: A statement about the size of the continuum, i.e., the number of elements in the set of real numbers. [e] (July 9)
- Hawaiian alphabet [r]: The form of writing used in the Hawaiian Language [e] (July 2)
- Now and Zen [r]: A 1988 studio album recorded by Robert Plant, with guest contributions from Jimmy Page. [e] (June 25)
- Wrench (tool) [r]: A fastening tool used to tighten or loosen threaded fasteners, with one end that makes firm contact with flat surfaces of the fastener, and the other end providing a means of applying force [e] (June 18)
- Air preheater [r]: A general term to describe any device designed to preheat the combustion air used in a fuel-burning furnace for the purpose of increasing the thermal efficiency of the furnace. [e] (June 11)
- 2009 H1N1 influenza virus [r]: A contagious influenza A virus discovered in April 2009, commonly known as swine flu. [e] (June 4)
- Gasoline [r]: A fuel for spark-ignited internal combustion engines derived from petroleum crude oil. [e] (21 May)
- John Brock [r]: Fictional British secret agent who starred in three 1960s thrillers by Desmond Skirrow. [e] (8 May)
- McGuffey Readers [r]: A set of highly influential school textbooks used in the 19th and early 20th centuries in the elementary grades in the United States. [e] (14 Apr)
- Vector rotation [r]: Process of rotating one unit vector into a second unit vector. [e] (7 Apr)
- Leptin [r]: Hormone secreted by adipocytes that regulates appetite. [e] (31 Mar)
- Kansas v. Crane [r]: A 2002 decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, ruling that a person could not be adjudicated a sexual predator and put in indefinite medical confinement, purely on assessment of an emotional disorder, but such action required proof of a likelihood of uncontrollable impulse presenting a clear and present danger. [e] (24 Mar)
- Punch card [r]: Add brief definition or description (17 Mar)
- Jass–Belote card games [r]: Add brief definition or description (10 Mar)
- Leptotes (orchid) [r]: Add brief definition or description (3 Mar)
- Worm (computers) [r]: Add brief definition or description (24 Feb)
- Joseph Black [r]: Add brief definition or description (11 Feb 2009)
- Sympathetic magic [r]: Add brief definition or description (17 Jan 2009)
- Dien Bien Phu [r]: Add brief definition or description (25 Dec)
- Blade Runner [r]: Add brief definition or description (25 Nov)
- Piquet [r]: Add brief definition or description (18 Nov)
- Crash of 2008 [r]: Add brief definition or description (23 Oct)
- Information Management [r]: Add brief definition or description (31 Aug)
- Battle of Gettysburg [r]: Add brief definition or description (8 July)
- Drugs banned from the Olympics [r]: Add brief definition or description (1 July)
- Sea glass [r]: Add brief definition or description (24 June)
- Dazed and Confused (Led Zeppelin song) [r]: Add brief definition or description (17 June)
- Hirohito [r]: Add brief definition or description (10 June)
- Henry Kissinger [r]: Add brief definition or description (3 June)
- Palatalization [r]: Add brief definition or description (27 May)
- Intelligence on the Korean War [r]: Add brief definition or description (20 May)
- Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago [r]: Add brief definition or description (13 May)
- BIOS [r]: Add brief definition or description (6 May)
- Miniature Fox Terrier [r]: Add brief definition or description (23 April)
- Joseph II [r]: Add brief definition or description (15 Apr)
- British and American English [r]: Add brief definition or description (7 Apr)
- Count Rumford [r]: Add brief definition or description (1 April)
- Whale meat [r]: Add brief definition or description (25 March)
- Naval guns [r]: Add brief definition or description (18 March)
- Sri Lanka [r]: Add brief definition or description (11 March)
- Led Zeppelin [r]: Add brief definition or description (4 March)
- Martin Luther [r]: Add brief definition or description (20 February)
- Cosmology [r]: Add brief definition or description (4 February)
- Ernest Rutherford [r]: Add brief definition or description(28 January)
- Edinburgh [r]: Add brief definition or description (21 January)
- Russian Revolution of 1905 [r]: Add brief definition or description (8 January 2008)
- Phosphorus [r]: Add brief definition or description (31 December)
- John Tyler [r]: Add brief definition or description (6 December)
- Banana [r]: Add brief definition or description (22 November)
- Augustin-Louis Cauchy [r]: Add brief definition or description (15 November)
- B-17 Flying Fortress (bomber) [r]: Add brief definition or description - 8 November 2007
- Red Sea Urchin [r]: Add brief definition or description - 1 November 2007
- Symphony [r]: Add brief definition or description - 25 October 2007
- Oxygen [r]: Add brief definition or description - 18 October 2007
- Origins and architecture of the Taj Mahal [r]: Add brief definition or description - 11 October 2007
- Fossilization (palaeontology) [r]: Add brief definition or description - 4 October 2007
- Cradle of Humankind [r]: Add brief definition or description - 27 September 2007
- John Adams [r]: Add brief definition or description - 20 September 2007
- Quakers [r]: Add brief definition or description - 13 September 2007
- Scarborough Castle [r]: Add brief definition or description - 6 September 2007
- Jane Addams [r]: Add brief definition or description - 30 August 2007
- Epidemiology [r]: Add brief definition or description - 23 August 2007
- Gay community [r]: Add brief definition or description - 16 August 2007
- Edward I [r]: Add brief definition or description - 9 August 2007
Rules and Procedure
Rules
- The primary criterion of eligibility for a new draft is that it must have been ranked as a status 1 or 2 (developed or developing), as documented in the History of the article's Metadate template, no more than one month before the date of the next selection (currently every Thursday).
- Any Citizen may nominate a draft.
- No Citizen may have nominated more than one article listed under "current nominees" at a time.
- The article's nominator is indicated simply by the first name in the list of votes (see below).
- At least for now--while the project is still small--you may nominate and vote for drafts of which you are a main author.
- An article can be the New Draft of the Week only once. Nominated articles that have won this honor should be removed from the list and added to the list of previous winners.
- Comments on nominations should be made on the article's talk page.
- Any draft will be deleted when it is past its "last date eligible". Don't worry if this happens to your article; consider nominating it as the Article of the Week.
- If an editor believes that a nominee in his or her area of expertise is ineligible (perhaps due to obvious and embarrassing problems) he or she may remove the draft from consideration. The editor must indicate the reasons why he has done so on the nominated article's talk page.
Nomination
See above section "Add New Nominees Here".
Voting
- To vote, add your name and date in the Supporters column next to an article title, after other supporters for that article, by signing
<br />~~~~
. (The date is necessary so that we can determine when the last vote was added.) Your vote is alloted a score of 1. - Add your name in the Specialist supporters column only if you are an editor who is an expert about the topic in question. Your vote is alloted a score of 1 for articles that you created and 2 for articles that you did not create.
- You may vote for as many articles as you wish, and each vote counts separately, but you can only nominate one at a time; see above. You could, theoretically, vote for every nominated article on the page, but this would be pointless.
Ranking
- The list of articles is sorted by number of votes first, then alphabetically.
- Admins should make sure that the votes are correctly tallied, but anyone may do this. Note that "Specialist Votes" are worth 3 points.
Updating
- Each Thursday, one of the admins listed below should move the winning article to the Current Winner section of this page, announce the winner on Citizendium-L and update the "previous winning drafts" section accordingly.
- The winning article will be the article at the top of the list (ie the one with the most votes).
- In the event of two or more having the same number of votes :
- The article with the most specialist supporters is used. Should this fail to produce a winner, the article appearing first by English alphabetical order is used.
- The remaining winning articles are guaranteed this position in the following weeks, again in alphabetical order. No further voting should take place on these, which remain at the top of the table with notices to that effect. Further nominations and voting take place to determine future winning articles for the following weeks.
- Winning articles may be named New Draft of the Week beyond their last eligible date if their circumstances are so described above.
- The article with the most specialist supporters is used. Should this fail to produce a winner, the article appearing first by English alphabetical order is used.
Administrators
The Administrators of this program are the same as the admins for CZ:Article of the Week.
References
See Also
- CZ:Article of the Week
- CZ:Markup tags for partial transclusion of selected text in an article
- CZ:Monthly Write-a-Thon
Citizendium Initiatives | ||
---|---|---|
Eduzendium | Featured Article | Recruitment | Subpages | Core Articles | Uncategorized pages | Requested Articles | Feedback Requests | Wanted Articles |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}