User talk:Chris Day: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris day (archive) |
imported>Chris day (return ongoing discussions) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{|align="center" style="border-top: solid 1px #AAAAAA;border-right: solid 1px #AAAAAA;border-bottom: solid 2px #666666;border-left: solid 2px #666666; background-color: lavender;" | |||
|colspan="2"| | |||
{{User:Chris day/talk header}} | |||
|- | |||
|{{User:Chris_day/talk_toc}} | |||
|rowspan="2"| | |||
{{User:Chris day/useful links}} | |||
|- | |||
|{{User:Chris day/newmessage}} | |||
|} | |||
== I aim to restrict my replies to this talk page.... == | |||
My hope is to preserve the context of each discussion rather than having them fragmented on mutliple talk pages. So please check back here for replies to messages you leave, thanks. Please sign comments with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> This makes it a lot easier to follow the ebb and flow of a discussion with multiple users. Indents are also useful to help track the sequence of replies and can be achieved using colons such as ''':''' or '''::'''. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 23:32, 13 November 2006 (CST) | |||
::For the benefit of newcomers, I mention that this can easily done by putting the page on one's watchlist, or setting the preferences to do so automatically.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] | |||
==Naming policy white paper== | |||
Hi Chris, Earlier, when I was having technical problems editing CZ pages, I left you a private message on the forum. Just wondering if you had seen it. --[[User:Jaap Winius|Jaap Winius]] 15:33, 2 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Macromolecular Chemistry == | |||
Chris, this article really needed a Chemistry editor that was not involved in writing for approval. At this point, we have a second Chemistry editor-who is also involved in writing. So approval is going to take a third. Let's all work together, maybe we can recruit more Chemistry editors for the workgroup. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 11:04, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Chemisty == | |||
Chris, after I approved, we later determined that both macromolecular chemistry and physical chemistry (and there is one more) needed two more chemistry editors to be approved (Nancy and Gareth didn't count), so we had to back track until others come along. Steve actually did the reversion. I'll see what happened to the talk pages and see what I can do to restore them. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 13:44, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
:OK, that makes sense, in that case we need to restore the talk page histories and delete the draft articles. It certainly confused me and I'm sure I'm not the only one. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 13:51, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
::Also, Nancy's message above now makes more sense. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 13:52, 3 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 13:56, 3 April 2007
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
|
| ||
User:Chris day/newmessage |
I aim to restrict my replies to this talk page....
My hope is to preserve the context of each discussion rather than having them fragmented on mutliple talk pages. So please check back here for replies to messages you leave, thanks. Please sign comments with four tildes ~~~~ This makes it a lot easier to follow the ebb and flow of a discussion with multiple users. Indents are also useful to help track the sequence of replies and can be achieved using colons such as : or ::. Chris Day (Talk) 23:32, 13 November 2006 (CST)
- For the benefit of newcomers, I mention that this can easily done by putting the page on one's watchlist, or setting the preferences to do so automatically.DavidGoodman
Naming policy white paper
Hi Chris, Earlier, when I was having technical problems editing CZ pages, I left you a private message on the forum. Just wondering if you had seen it. --Jaap Winius 15:33, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
Macromolecular Chemistry
Chris, this article really needed a Chemistry editor that was not involved in writing for approval. At this point, we have a second Chemistry editor-who is also involved in writing. So approval is going to take a third. Let's all work together, maybe we can recruit more Chemistry editors for the workgroup. Nancy Sculerati 11:04, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
Chemisty
Chris, after I approved, we later determined that both macromolecular chemistry and physical chemistry (and there is one more) needed two more chemistry editors to be approved (Nancy and Gareth didn't count), so we had to back track until others come along. Steve actually did the reversion. I'll see what happened to the talk pages and see what I can do to restore them. --Matt Innis (Talk) 13:44, 3 April 2007 (CDT)