Talk:Rachel Ricketts: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>George Swan
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
(PropDel removed for now, but this marginally useful article is still an orphan, unlinked to anything else in the wiki; she did publish one book, so that is currently the ONLY justification for an article about her existing; social media presence is NOT a reason)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Should this article be kept or deleted? ==
Should this article be kept or deleted?
It was [https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Rachel_Ricketts&diff=next&oldid=865789 tagged] with a {{tl|PropDel}} on 2024-05-06.  But no note was left here on [[Talk:Rachel Ricketts]], explaining the concern that triggered the proposal.  There is no hint in the edit summary as to what triggered the proposal.
The second paragraph of [[Rachel Ricketts#Author]] says:
<blockquote>
Several publications, including ''[[Forbes magazine]]'', ''[[Parade magazine]]'', ''[[Good Morning America]]'' and ''[[The Vancouver Sun]]'', interviewed Ricketts following the publication of her book.
</blockquote>
Normally, multiple interviews, in major publications, has been considered sufficient to establish an author is important enough to merit a standalone article.  [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 10:47, 6 May 2024 (CDT)
:This article is still not linked to anything else in this wiki.  It needs to be linked to a major topic to be kept indefinitely.  I have removed the delete tag for now, but as an article about a living person, with everything here also covered by the press, and with no links to other articles in this wiki, it's future survival is shaky.  Please find ways to cross-link it. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 14:25, 14 July 2024 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 14:29, 14 July 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Lawyer, author, anti-racims activist [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Law, Politics and Topic Informant [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Should this article be kept or deleted?

Should this article be kept or deleted?

It was tagged with a {{PropDel}} on 2024-05-06. But no note was left here on Talk:Rachel Ricketts, explaining the concern that triggered the proposal. There is no hint in the edit summary as to what triggered the proposal.

The second paragraph of Rachel Ricketts#Author says:

Several publications, including Forbes magazine, Parade magazine, Good Morning America and The Vancouver Sun, interviewed Ricketts following the publication of her book.

Normally, multiple interviews, in major publications, has been considered sufficient to establish an author is important enough to merit a standalone article. George Swan (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2024 (CDT)

This article is still not linked to anything else in this wiki. It needs to be linked to a major topic to be kept indefinitely. I have removed the delete tag for now, but as an article about a living person, with everything here also covered by the press, and with no links to other articles in this wiki, it's future survival is shaky. Please find ways to cross-link it. Pat Palmer (talk) 14:25, 14 July 2024 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Rachel_Ricketts&oldid=963171"