Bipolar transistor: Difference between revisions
imported>John R. Brews (→Operation: current gain) |
imported>John R. Brews (→Current gain β: Gummel plot) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
===Current gain β=== | ===Current gain β=== | ||
In applications a key parameter is the bipolar current gain, the ratio of DC collector to DC emitter current, usually called the ''common emitter current gain'' and denoted by ''β''. In view of the similarity between forward injection of electrons from emitter to base and the backward injection of holes to the emitter, one could be forgiven for expecting not much difference. However, the structure can be designed to greatly favor the injection of forward current over the back-injection of holes. Several factors influence the comparison. First, heavily doping the emitter and lightly doping the base will increase the electron density at the barrier ''φ<sub>n</sub>'' compared to the hole density at ''φ<sub>p</sub>''. Also, increasing the gradient of carrier density in the base will increase the electron diffusion current, suggesting a narrow base favors forward injection. Likewise, a lower gradient of hole density in the emitter will tend to suppress backward injection. Unlike the base, where a reverse biased collector insures a low carrier density at the far side of the base, in the emitter this function is served by the recombination of holes at the interface with the metal or polysilicon contact to the emitter. | {{Image|Gummel plot.PNG|right|200px|Gummel plot and current gain for a GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure bipolar transistor.}} | ||
In applications a key parameter is the bipolar current gain, the ratio of DC collector to DC emitter current, usually called the ''common emitter current gain'' and denoted by ''β''. In view of the similarity between forward injection of electrons from emitter to base and the backward injection of holes to the emitter, one could be forgiven for expecting not much difference. However, the structure can be designed to greatly favor the injection of forward current over the back-injection of holes. Several factors influence the comparison. First, heavily doping the emitter and lightly doping the base will increase the electron density at the barrier ''φ<sub>n</sub>'' compared to the hole density at ''φ<sub>p</sub>''. Also, increasing the gradient of carrier density in the base will increase the electron diffusion current, suggesting a narrow base favors forward injection. Likewise, a lower gradient of hole density in the emitter will tend to suppress backward injection. Unlike the base, where a reverse biased collector insures a low carrier density at the far side of the base, in the emitter this function is served by the recombination of holes at the interface with the metal or polysilicon contact to the emitter. The polysilicon contact is found to be advantageous because the hole current in polysilicon is reduced compared to silicon not because the gradient of the hole concentration is affected, but because much less current flows in polysilicon than in crystalline silicon for the same gradient. | |||
The figure shows a Gummel plot for one bipolar transistor. This plot is useful for showing the range of bias over which the currents follow an exponential dependence upon base-emitter voltage, the center of this plot, and the onset of non-ideal behavior at high and low current levels. It also allows the current level dependence of the current gain to be assessed. | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 18:10, 11 June 2011
In electronics, the bipolar transistor, more completely the bipolar junction transistor, is a three terminal semiconductor device used for switching and amplification. In concept it consists of two back-to-back pn-diodes, forming either a pnp or an npn sandwich, where p refers to semiconductor doped to produce positively charge carriers (holes) and n refers to semiconductor doped to provide negatively charged carriers (electrons). However, the center region is thin enough to allow carriers injected from one of the end layers (the emitter E) to actually diffuse across the center region (the base B) and be collected by the other end region (the collector C).
Very small changes in the emitter-base junction voltage have an exponential influence over the number of carriers injected from the emitter, and so the base has enormous control over the current diffusing across the base to the collector. Moreover, the current consumed by the base in normal operation is very small, so the device serves well to amplify either a current or a voltage signal applied to the base.
History
The bipolar transistor was the historically first transistor invented. Prior to its invention in 1947 by Bardeen, Brattain and Shockley at Bell Laboratories, semiconductor devices were only two-terminal devices, like diodes and rectifiers. More of the history and development of this device can be found in an historical article by Shockley[1] and a more recent history.[2]
Operation
The bipolar transistor can operate in a number of modes, distinguished by which junctions are injecting (forward bias of emitter-base or collector-base or both) and which are collecting (reverse bias of emitter-base or collector base, or both). Here focus is upon the active mode in which the emitter-base junction is injecting and the collector-base junction is collecting. This mode is commonly used in analog circuits.
Using a band diagram as shown to the right, the operation can be understood. The diagram shows an npn transistor. The conduction band labeled CB shows the lowest energy of an electron (in electron volts, or energy divided by electron charge) in the conduction band of the semiconductor as a function of position in the npn transistor. The valence band labeled VB shows the highest energy for electrons in the semiconductor valence band. These two energy levels are separated by the semiconductor energy gap, a region of forbidden energy for an electron. The CB and VB vary in position within the transistor for two reasons: if no bias is applied, the band edges vary because impurity atoms set the number of carriers, and the bands must adjust position to insure the correct carrier densities. For more detail, see the article semiconductor.
The majority carrier Fermi levels in the various regions are shown as determined by the impurity dopant levels: EFn for electrons in the field-free bulk of the emitter, EFp for holes in the field free portion of the base, and EFn for electrons in the field-free bulk of the collector. If the biases are reduced to zero, these Fermi levels all coincide.
When bias is applied, the relative energies of the different regions are modified, upsetting equilibrium and causing the band edges to adjust in response. The Fermi levels are separated by the application of bias voltages across the junctions. The forward bias VBE splits the hole Fermi level in the base from the electron Fermi level in the emitter. Likewise, the reverse bias VCB splits the electron Fermi level in the bulk collector from the hole Fermi level in the field-free region of the base.
The base-emitter junction is forward biased, that is, the base is made positive with respect to the emitter, attracting electrons. This forward bias VBE reduces the barrier φn that opposes entry of electrons into the base. Because the barrier is smaller, electrons enter the base, raising the concentration of electrons in the base above the normal equilibrium level and setting up a concentration gradient of electron density across the base. That gradient drives a diffusion current of electrons across the base (transport according to Fick's law of diffusion), toward the collector. At the same time, the collector is reverse biased by a voltage VCB with respect to the base, that is, made positive with respect to base, so it attracts electrons. This attraction reduces the electron density on the collector side of the base, adding to the gradient in electron density across the field-free portion of the base. The electrons diffusing across the base eventually reach the end of the field-free region, and enter the accelerating electric field created by the reverse bias on the collector. The transport of electrons then switches from diffusion due to the carrier gradient to drift under the action of the electric field.
The strong effect upon the collector current exerted by the base-emitter bias can be understood in terms of its large effect upon the electron density at the base-emitter interface. The number of electrons at the top of the barrier is a factor exp(−φn/Vth) smaller than the density in the emitter itself. Here Vth is the so-called thermal voltage given by:
where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature in kelvins. At 290 K, Vth ≈ 25 mV. Thus, a change in this barrier height by an applied bias to become VBE smaller means the electron density at the top of the barrier becomes larger by a factor exp(VBE/Vth), a large exponential increase.
Using the same argument, the backward injection of holes from the base into the emitter also is increased by this same exponential factor. These holes recombine with electrons in the emitter and form a parasitic current consumption that must be supplied by the base current.
The heterojunction bipolar transistor attempts to reduce back injection of holes into the emitter by incorporating a wide bandgap emitter that will increase the barrier φp without increasing φn by changing the alignment of the valence bands of emitter and base without significant alteration of the conduction band alignment. Similarly, narrow bandgap base materials can reduce the electron barrier without reducing the hole barrier by realigning the conduction bands of emitter and base without significant change in the valence band alignment.[3]
Current gain β
In applications a key parameter is the bipolar current gain, the ratio of DC collector to DC emitter current, usually called the common emitter current gain and denoted by β. In view of the similarity between forward injection of electrons from emitter to base and the backward injection of holes to the emitter, one could be forgiven for expecting not much difference. However, the structure can be designed to greatly favor the injection of forward current over the back-injection of holes. Several factors influence the comparison. First, heavily doping the emitter and lightly doping the base will increase the electron density at the barrier φn compared to the hole density at φp. Also, increasing the gradient of carrier density in the base will increase the electron diffusion current, suggesting a narrow base favors forward injection. Likewise, a lower gradient of hole density in the emitter will tend to suppress backward injection. Unlike the base, where a reverse biased collector insures a low carrier density at the far side of the base, in the emitter this function is served by the recombination of holes at the interface with the metal or polysilicon contact to the emitter. The polysilicon contact is found to be advantageous because the hole current in polysilicon is reduced compared to silicon not because the gradient of the hole concentration is affected, but because much less current flows in polysilicon than in crystalline silicon for the same gradient.
The figure shows a Gummel plot for one bipolar transistor. This plot is useful for showing the range of bias over which the currents follow an exponential dependence upon base-emitter voltage, the center of this plot, and the onset of non-ideal behavior at high and low current levels. It also allows the current level dependence of the current gain to be assessed.
References
- ↑ WS Shockley (1976). "The path to the conception of the junction transistor". IEEE Trans Electron Dev. ED-23: pp. 597 ff.
- ↑ M Riordan & L Hoddeson (1997). Crystal fire: the birth of the information age. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0393041247.
- ↑ C. K. Maiti, G. A. Armstrong (2001). “Principle of SiGe HBTs”, Applications of silicon-germanium heterostructure devices. CRC Press, pp. 77 ff. ISBN 0750307234.