Guantanamo captives' documents: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Could we PLEASE merge this into Guantanamo? Removed a good deal of material having to do little with documents) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (PLEASE allow a merge into Guantanamo and deletion of this article. Removed much text that has nothing to do with documents) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
Initially the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] [[United States President|Presidency]] asserted that they did not have to publish any of the '''Guantanamo captive's documents'''. They asserted that no captive apprehended in [[Afghanistan]] was entitled to the protections of the [[Geneva | {{TOC-right}} | ||
Initially the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] [[United States President|Presidency]] asserted that they did not have to publish any of the '''Guantanamo captive's documents'''. They asserted that no captive apprehended in [[Afghanistan]] was entitled to the protections of the [[Geneva Conventions]], and that those held in the [[Guantanamo Bay Naval Base]] were not protected by US law either, because it was not on US territory. In [[Rasul v. Bush]] the Supreme Court over-ruled the Executive Branch, and clarified that US law did apply in Guantanamo. | |||
By September 2007, 11 official lists have been published; see [[Guantanamo captives' documents/External Links]]. Many captives names were spelled inconsistently on these lists, which is consistent with the problems of consistent transliteration from nonroman orthography in languages such as Arabic, Farsi and Pashtun. Detainee numbers also were inconsistent, which Mackey observed was true at temporary facilities in Afghanistan. <ref name=Mackey>{{citation | By September 2007, 11 official lists have been published; see [[Guantanamo captives' documents/External Links]]. Many captives names were spelled inconsistently on these lists, which is consistent with the problems of consistent transliteration from nonroman orthography in languages such as Arabic, Farsi and Pashtun. Detainee numbers also were inconsistent, which Mackey observed was true at temporary facilities in Afghanistan. <ref name=Mackey>{{citation |
Revision as of 09:40, 27 March 2009
Template:TOC-right Initially the Bush Presidency asserted that they did not have to publish any of the Guantanamo captive's documents. They asserted that no captive apprehended in Afghanistan was entitled to the protections of the Geneva Conventions, and that those held in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base were not protected by US law either, because it was not on US territory. In Rasul v. Bush the Supreme Court over-ruled the Executive Branch, and clarified that US law did apply in Guantanamo.
By September 2007, 11 official lists have been published; see Guantanamo captives' documents/External Links. Many captives names were spelled inconsistently on these lists, which is consistent with the problems of consistent transliteration from nonroman orthography in languages such as Arabic, Farsi and Pashtun. Detainee numbers also were inconsistent, which Mackey observed was true at temporary facilities in Afghanistan. [1]
Documents prepared for non-court administrative hearings.
Based on Rasul v. Bush, the Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants (OARDEC) is responsible for the implementation of a one time Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT) and annual Administrative Review Board (ARB) hearings.
Combatant Status Review Tribunal
The CSR Tribunals mandate is to make a determination as to whether the Guantanamo captives had been correctly determined to have been "enemy combatants".
CSRT unclassified dossiers
179 Guantanamo captives had the unclassified documents prepared for their Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRT) released to their lawyers. In 2005 the Associated Press hosted 58 of these unclassified CSRT dossiers.[2]
Administrative Review Board
The ARBs mandate is to annually review each captive's case and make a recommendation as to whether the USA has a continuing reason to hold the captive.
Habeas Corpus documents
Thousands of pages from captives habeas corpus requests have been made public.
Military Commission charge sheets
In 2004 four captives faced charges before the first version of the Guantanamo military commissions. The charge sheets against these men were made public. In 2005 a further five captives faced charges, before the second version of the military commissions. Their charge sheets were also made public.
In 2006 one more captive faced charges before the second version of the military commissions.
In the fall of 2006 Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and new charges before themm were made public.
In 2008 seventeen more sets of charges were filed under the Military Commissions Act. Most but not all of the original ten captives initially charged under the Presidentially authorized Military Commissions faced new charges under the Military Commissions Act. These charges were made public.
September 10th, 2007 publications
The DoD published nine new lists and 112 pdf files containing new documents, or new versions of previously published documents.[3]
Index for Combatant Status Review Board unclassified summaries of evidence |
|
Index for Testimony | |
Index for CSRT Records Publicly Files in Guantanamo Detainee Cases | |
Index of Transcripts and Certain Documents from ARB Round One | |
Index to Summaries of Detention-Release Factors for ARB Round One |
|
Index to Transfer and Release Decision for Guantanamo Detainees |
|
Index to Transcripts and Certain Documents from Administrative Review Boards Round Two | |
Index of Summaries of Detention-Release Factors for ARB Round Two |
|
Index of Transfer and Release Decision for Guantanamo Detainees from ARB Round Two |
|
Captives released because they were not combatants
On November 19, 2007 the Department of Defense published an official list of the 38 men's names.[17]
References
- ↑ Chris Mackey & Greg Miller (2004), The Interrogators: inside the secret war against al Qaeda, Little, Brown & Co., ISBN 0-316-87112-5
- ↑ OARDEC (2007-07-17). Index for Combatant Status Review Board unclassified summaries of evidence. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 OARDEC. Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT) and Administrative Review Board (ARB) Documents, United States Department of Defense, September 10 2007. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedCSRTSummaryofEvidenceJan2005
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedCSRTSummaryofEvidenceFeb2005
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedCSRTSummaryofEvidenceMar2005
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedCSRTSummaryofEvidenceApril2005
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedCSRTSummaryofEvidencSpring2005
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedOardecCsrtTranscripts20070904
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedOardecPubliclyFiledDocuments20070910
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedOardecArb1Transcripts20070809
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedOardecArb1Factors
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedOardecArb1DecisionMemos20070717
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedOardecArb2Transcripts20070717
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedOardecArb2Factors20070717
- ↑ OARDEC (August 10 2007). Index Index of Transfer and Release Decision for Guantanamo Detainees from ARB Round Two. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
- ↑ Detainees Found to No Longer Meet the Definition of "Enemy Combatant" during Combatant Status Review Tribunals Held at Guantanamo, United States Department of Defense, November 19, 2007. Retrieved on 2008-04-15.