User talk:Warren Schudy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
(thanks for helping out on Core Articles)
imported>Pat Palmer
(response on core article feedback request)
Line 6: Line 6:
==nice job on the Core Articles!==
==nice job on the Core Articles!==
Hey thanks for beating our [[CZ:Core_Articles/Applied_Arts_and_Sciences#Computers_-_Stage_2]] into shape![[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:58, 9 January 2008 (CST)
Hey thanks for beating our [[CZ:Core_Articles/Applied_Arts_and_Sciences#Computers_-_Stage_2]] into shape![[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:58, 9 January 2008 (CST)
:Warren, I finally had time today to look over the list.  I made one change, reversing the positions of RAM (which you had given 10 points) with "virtual memory".  So VM would be (in my scheme of things) worth 10 points, and RAM nothing.  This is all a matter of opinion.  I edited a little on what was just a stub for virtual memory to try and illustrate why I think it's so important.  When you have time, you might take a look and lemme know what you think.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:28, 16 January 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 22:28, 16 January 2008

welcome

Warren, Just wanted to say hi and thanks for contributing to the Computers workgroup.Pat Palmer 18:04, 6 January 2008 (CST)

nice job on the Core Articles!

Hey thanks for beating our CZ:Core_Articles/Applied_Arts_and_Sciences#Computers_-_Stage_2 into shape!Pat Palmer 21:58, 9 January 2008 (CST)

Warren, I finally had time today to look over the list. I made one change, reversing the positions of RAM (which you had given 10 points) with "virtual memory". So VM would be (in my scheme of things) worth 10 points, and RAM nothing. This is all a matter of opinion. I edited a little on what was just a stub for virtual memory to try and illustrate why I think it's so important. When you have time, you might take a look and lemme know what you think.Pat Palmer 21:28, 16 January 2008 (CST)