User talk:Jean-Philippe de Lespinay/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick (Blatant self promotion) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Removal {{Removal|open}}: removal case closed) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive box}} | |||
== Removal {{Removal|user}} == | |||
''Removal suggested by ''[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 21:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
''Editorial Council:'' [http://ec.citizendium.org/wiki/EC:Removals_2011 Case 2011-007] | |||
: Opened: --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
: Closed: Page moved to user talk subpage [[User talk:Jean-Philippe de Lespinay/La Maieutique]] | |||
---- | |||
=== Comments === | |||
Pretty blatant self-promotion here. The article opens by giving credit to the article's author. -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 21:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC) | Pretty blatant self-promotion here. The article opens by giving credit to the article's author. -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 21:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
: Indeed, this article is written like promotional blurb. While it is possible that this topic deserves an article, this text lacks sufficient evidence of it. Moreover, even if this were the case, this exposition would fail to give substantial information. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 8 November 2011
Removal
Removal suggested by Joe Quick 21:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Editorial Council: Case 2011-007
- Opened: --Peter Schmitt 01:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Closed: Page moved to user talk subpage User talk:Jean-Philippe de Lespinay/La Maieutique
Comments
Pretty blatant self-promotion here. The article opens by giving credit to the article's author. -Joe Quick 21:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, this article is written like promotional blurb. While it is possible that this topic deserves an article, this text lacks sufficient evidence of it. Moreover, even if this were the case, this exposition would fail to give substantial information. --Peter Schmitt 01:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)