User talk:James F. Perry: Difference between revisions
imported>Jason Sanford (not a problem) |
imported>Russell Potter (Joan of Arc) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Not a problem. Glad to help out. Best,--[[User:Jason Sanford|Jason Sanford]] 08:35, 8 January 2007 (CST) | Not a problem. Glad to help out. Best,--[[User:Jason Sanford|Jason Sanford]] 08:35, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
== Joan of Arc == | |||
Hi James, thanks for your notes on my talk page. | |||
The things you're doing make sense to me on one level -- you are adding and expanding content on some very important issues relating to Joan of Arc. My only question is why remove them from the main biographical entry? I could imagine a long article on, say, medieval women mystics, with a subsection on Visions which might include some of the things you've been working on, and cross-referencing this to the main entry. But if you take the section on Visions out of the main entry altogether, you render the main entry far less valuable, I fear. Some summary, or shortened version, should remain in any case; if there is to be a separate article on Joan's visions, it should be clearly cross-referenced with the main entry. | |||
Perhaps this question should be talked about in either the History or Religion discussion forums? It might well be a very good article to breathe some life into those forums with! | |||
cheers, | |||
[[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 13:11, 9 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 14:11, 9 January 2007
Hi, James F. Perry -- I'm just posting a note here to see why you feel that Joan of Arc's visions ought to be removed from the main article. I'm puzzled by the change, but open to hearing why you thought it a good idea. Regards,
Russell Potter 20:09, 7 January 2007 (CST)
Not a problem. Glad to help out. Best,--Jason Sanford 08:35, 8 January 2007 (CST)
Joan of Arc
Hi James, thanks for your notes on my talk page.
The things you're doing make sense to me on one level -- you are adding and expanding content on some very important issues relating to Joan of Arc. My only question is why remove them from the main biographical entry? I could imagine a long article on, say, medieval women mystics, with a subsection on Visions which might include some of the things you've been working on, and cross-referencing this to the main entry. But if you take the section on Visions out of the main entry altogether, you render the main entry far less valuable, I fear. Some summary, or shortened version, should remain in any case; if there is to be a separate article on Joan's visions, it should be clearly cross-referenced with the main entry.
Perhaps this question should be talked about in either the History or Religion discussion forums? It might well be a very good article to breathe some life into those forums with!
cheers,
Russell Potter 13:11, 9 January 2007 (CST)