User talk:George Swan/sandbox/United States Army Field Manual on interrogation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
imported>Hayford Peirce
Line 12: Line 12:


'''The article below may be edited, expanded, and improved by any Citizen; it may NOT be deleted except by a Constable'''
'''The article below may be edited, expanded, and improved by any Citizen; it may NOT be deleted except by a Constable'''
== Text that has been removed from main article to be held here for future editing ==
[[Image:Field Manual - Human Intelligence Collector Operations 529 x 352 - lo.jpg|right|thumb|350px|{{#ifexist:Template:Field Manual - Human Intelligence Collector Operations 529 x 352 - lo.jpg/credit|{{Field Manual - Human Intelligence Collector Operations 529 x 352 - lo.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}} General John Kimmons, on September 6th, 2006, when the most recent revision of the DoD most recent Field Manual for interrogators was released.]]
The '''United States Army Field Manual on interrogation''' instructs military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with U.S. and international law.
The Field Manual was sometimes known by the code '''FM 34-52'''.
The most recent revision was renamed
'''Field Manual FM 2-22.3, Human Intelligence Collector Operations'''.
== Interrogations during the "global war on terror" == et
During the American war on terror the [[Secretary of Defense]] [[Donald Rumsfeld]] issued "extended interrogation techniques", that went farther than those authorized in the Army field manual.  The extended techniques stimulated debate, both within the Bush administration, and outside it.  And various revisions of the extended techniques were issued.
Rumsfeld intended the extended techniques to be used only on the captives the United States classified as "[[illegal combatant]]s".  But extended interrogation techniques were adopted in [[Iraq]], even though captives there were entitled to protection under the Geneva Conventions.  General [[Geoffrey Miller]], who was then the director of interrogation of detainees held in [[Guantanamo Bay]], and some of his staff were sent to Iraq to help transfer their interrogation experience.  Military Intelligence troops who had been using extended techniques in [[Afghanistan]], notably Captain [[Carolyn Wood]].
General [[Ricardo Sanchez]], the CO of American forces in Iraq, after input from Miller and his team, and from Captain Wood, issued his own set of extended techniques. 
On [[April 28]], [[2005]] Rumsfeld announced that the Army would be revising the manual.  The revised manual would have spelled out more clearly which interrogation techniques were prohibited.
On [[July 25]], [[2005]] [[US Senator|Senator]] [[John McCain]] tabled an amendment to the a military spending bill, intended to restrict all US government interrogators from using interrogation techniques not authorized in the Army field manual.
On [[October 20]], [[2005]] [[VPOTUS|Vice President]] [[Dick Cheney]] met with McCain to try to convince him to agree that his amendment should only apply to military interrogators.  Cheney wanted to continue to allow civilian interrogators, working for US intelligence agencies, to use more extended interrogation techniques.  McCain did not agree.
==Plans to revise the manual to allow extended techniques==
On [[April 28]], [[2005]] Rumsfeld announced that the Army would be revising the manual. The revised manual would have spelled out more clearly which interrogation techniques were prohibited.
On [[December 14]], [[2005]], the [[New York Times]] reported that the Army Field Manual had been rewritten by the Pentagon. Previously, the manual's interrogation techniques section could be read freely on the internet. But the new edition's includes 10 classified pages in the interrogation technique section, leaving the public clueless about what the government considers not to be torture. <ref name=Nytimes051214> [http://http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/14/politics/14detain.html?ei=5088&en=01127d6827875971&ex=1292216400&adxnnl=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1149699906-pw2Tmp6F/7rQnmwhM+avIg New Army Rules May Snarl Talks With McCain on Detainee Issue], ''[[New York Times]]'', [[December 14]] [[2005]] - [http://www.uusc.org/info/article010406.html mirror]</ref>
On [[June 5]] [[2006]] the [[Los Angeles Times]] reported that the Pentagon's revisions will remove the proscription against "humiliating and degrading treatment", and other proscriptions from [[wikisource:third geneva convention#article 3|article 3]] of the [[third Geneva Convention]].<ref name=TheJurist060605> [http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/06/geneva-references-omitted-from-revised.php Geneva references omitted from revised Army interrogation manual], ''[[The Jurist]]'', [[June 5]] [[2006]]</ref>
<ref name=Latimes060605> [http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-torture5jun05,0,7975161.story?track=tottext Army Manual to Skip Geneva Detainee Rule], ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', [[June 5]] [[2006]]</ref>
The LA Times reports that the State Department has argued against the revisions because of the effect it will have on the world's opinion of the United States.
===Classified addendum===
According to the [[New York Times]], unlike previous versions, a draft of the new version  of the manual from late 2005 contained a ten page classified addendum.<ref name=NYTimes20051214>
{{cite news
| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/14/politics/14detain.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
| title=New Army Rules May Snarl Talks With McCain on Detainee Issue
| publisher=[[New York Times]]
| author=Eric Schmitt
| date=December 14, 2005
| accessdate=2008-04-10
| quote=
}}</ref>
''[[The Jurist]]'' reported on a draft with classified sections on May 5, 2006.<ref name=TheJurist20060503>
{{cite news
| url=http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/05/revised-army-interrogation-manual-held.php
| title=Revised Army interrogation manual held up by secrecy concerns
| publisher=[[The Jurist]]
| author=Jamie Sterling
| date=Wednesday, May 03, 2006
| accessdate=2008-04-10
| quote=
}}</ref>
==September 6 2006 release==
The new version was released on September 6, 2006.<ref name=GlobalSecurity20060906a>
{{cite news
| url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/news/2006/09/sec-060906-dod02.htm
| title=DoD News Briefing with Deputy Assistant Secretary Stimson and Lt. Gen. Kimmons from the Pentagon
| publisher=[[Global Security]]
| author=
| date=September 6, 2006
| accessdate=2008-04-10
| quote=
}}</ref><ref name=GlobalSecurity20060906b>
{{cite news
| url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2006/09/mil-060906-army01.htm
| title=Army Publishes New Intelligence Manual
| publisher=[[Global Security]]
| author=
| date=September 6, 2006
| accessdate=2008-04-10
| quote=
}}</ref><ref name=TheJurist20060906>
{{cite news
| url=http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/09/new-us-army-interrogation-manual.php
| title=New US Army interrogation manual mandates Geneva rules
| publisher=[[The Jurist]]
| author=Jeannie Shawl
| date=Wednesday, September 06, 2006
| accessdate=2008-04-10
| quote=
}}</ref>
*''The Jurist'' reported that the final version of the manual contained no classified sections.<ref name=TheJurist20060906/>
*''The Jurist'' reported that the final version of the manual explicitly reference [[common article 3]] of the [[Geneva Conventions]].<ref name=TheJurist20060906/>
*''The Jurist'' reported that the manual applied to all captives of the US military custody, and to all captives of the [[CIA]], in military custody, but it would not apply to captives of the CIA in CIA custody.<ref name=TheJurist20060906/>
According to ''The Jurist''<ref name=TheJurist20060906/>:
{{quotation|After the US Supreme Court's June ruling in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, however, the Pentagon said that the Geneva Conventions would be applied to all detainees held in US military custody around the world, reversing the Defense Department's policy of classifying detainees as "enemy combatants" outside the protections of Article 3.}}
== See also ==
*[[detainees in CIA custody]]
== Online versions ==
*[http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/policy/army/fm/fm34-52/ .html version of FM 34-52], circa [[May 8]], [[1987]]
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm34-52.pdf .pdf version of FM 34-52], circa [[September 28]], [[1992]]
*[http://www.army.mil/institution/armypublicaffairs/pdf/fm2-22-3.pdf  .pdf version of Field Manual FM 2-22.3, "Human Intelligence Collector Operations."], circa [[September 6]], [[2006]]  (supercedes Field Manual 34-52.)
==References==
<references/>
== External links ==
*[http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/media/2005_alerts/etn_0428_manual.htm Torture: Proposed New Army Field Manual Is a First Step but Must Apply to Everyone], ''[[human rights first]]'', [[April 28]], [[2005]]
*[http://mccain.senate.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=NewsCenter.ViewPressRelease&Content_id=1595 Statement of Senator John McCain Amendment on Army Field Manual], [[July 25]], [[2005]]
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/24/AR2005102402051.html Cheney Plan Exempts CIA From Bill Barring Abuse of Detainees], ''[[Washington Post]]'', [[October 25]], [[2005]]

Revision as of 11:45, 14 February 2009

The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User talk pages.

Fountain pen.png
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of this version. George Swan 10:21, 10 April 2008 (CDT)
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice.

update

I went back to an old version, so as to avoid the "from wikipedia" tag. The article therefore is about two years out of date... George Swan 10:30, 10 April 2008 (CDT)

Constable's decision to move disputed article to Discussion page for the moment

A Constable has considered an Editor's request to delete the main article. He has decided that the Editor's decription of the reasons for deleting the article is at least partially incorrect: there is absolutely no evidence that the article is a "tirade against the Bush administration". It seems to the Constable that the article is actually very even-handed and neutral. The Constable is incapable of addressing the other issues raised of whether the facts are inaccurate or out-of-date. If either is the case, then they are susceptible to editing by others. The Constable feels that there is no reason for an article such as this NOT to be a CZ article, providing it meets Editorial norms. He is therefore placing it here for future editing until it DOES meet Editorial standards.

The article below may be edited, expanded, and improved by any Citizen; it may NOT be deleted except by a Constable

Text that has been removed from main article to be held here for future editing

(PD) Photo: R.D. Ward
General John Kimmons, on September 6th, 2006, when the most recent revision of the DoD most recent Field Manual for interrogators was released.

The United States Army Field Manual on interrogation instructs military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with U.S. and international law. The Field Manual was sometimes known by the code FM 34-52. The most recent revision was renamed Field Manual FM 2-22.3, Human Intelligence Collector Operations.

== Interrogations during the "global war on terror" == et

During the American war on terror the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld issued "extended interrogation techniques", that went farther than those authorized in the Army field manual. The extended techniques stimulated debate, both within the Bush administration, and outside it. And various revisions of the extended techniques were issued.

Rumsfeld intended the extended techniques to be used only on the captives the United States classified as "illegal combatants". But extended interrogation techniques were adopted in Iraq, even though captives there were entitled to protection under the Geneva Conventions. General Geoffrey Miller, who was then the director of interrogation of detainees held in Guantanamo Bay, and some of his staff were sent to Iraq to help transfer their interrogation experience. Military Intelligence troops who had been using extended techniques in Afghanistan, notably Captain Carolyn Wood.

General Ricardo Sanchez, the CO of American forces in Iraq, after input from Miller and his team, and from Captain Wood, issued his own set of extended techniques.

On April 28, 2005 Rumsfeld announced that the Army would be revising the manual. The revised manual would have spelled out more clearly which interrogation techniques were prohibited.

On July 25, 2005 Senator John McCain tabled an amendment to the a military spending bill, intended to restrict all US government interrogators from using interrogation techniques not authorized in the Army field manual.

On October 20, 2005 Vice President Dick Cheney met with McCain to try to convince him to agree that his amendment should only apply to military interrogators. Cheney wanted to continue to allow civilian interrogators, working for US intelligence agencies, to use more extended interrogation techniques. McCain did not agree.

Plans to revise the manual to allow extended techniques

On April 28, 2005 Rumsfeld announced that the Army would be revising the manual. The revised manual would have spelled out more clearly which interrogation techniques were prohibited.

On December 14, 2005, the New York Times reported that the Army Field Manual had been rewritten by the Pentagon. Previously, the manual's interrogation techniques section could be read freely on the internet. But the new edition's includes 10 classified pages in the interrogation technique section, leaving the public clueless about what the government considers not to be torture. [1]

On June 5 2006 the Los Angeles Times reported that the Pentagon's revisions will remove the proscription against "humiliating and degrading treatment", and other proscriptions from article 3 of the third Geneva Convention.[2] [3] The LA Times reports that the State Department has argued against the revisions because of the effect it will have on the world's opinion of the United States.

Classified addendum

According to the New York Times, unlike previous versions, a draft of the new version of the manual from late 2005 contained a ten page classified addendum.[4] The Jurist reported on a draft with classified sections on May 5, 2006.[5]

September 6 2006 release

The new version was released on September 6, 2006.[6][7][8]

  • The Jurist reported that the final version of the manual contained no classified sections.[8]
  • The Jurist reported that the final version of the manual explicitly reference common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.[8]
  • The Jurist reported that the manual applied to all captives of the US military custody, and to all captives of the CIA, in military custody, but it would not apply to captives of the CIA in CIA custody.[8]

According to The Jurist[8]:

After the US Supreme Court's June ruling in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, however, the Pentagon said that the Geneva Conventions would be applied to all detainees held in US military custody around the world, reversing the Defense Department's policy of classifying detainees as "enemy combatants" outside the protections of Article 3.

See also

Online versions

References

External links