User:Robert W King

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Status

I have returned; Work is 30% complete on the Milling Machine(see flickr set here). Articles will continue tonight. --Robert W King 19:59, 14 October 2007 (CDT)


About me

Quack!

I am currently a young professional working as a Quality Assurance Analyst somewhere in Northern Virginia. I hold an Associate's in Information Technology from NVCC and am working (infrequently) on my B.S. in Information Technology from George Mason University. My interests include data organization, networks, philosophy, critical thinking, and observation.

In the past I have contributed to U.S. Government articles within Wikipedia, and reported on the Wired-sponsored Assignment Zero. (Profile here, contributions here)

My Sandbox: Testing grounds.

CZ's Core Article Initiative: CZ:CORE


List of Wikipedia articles I have authored and/or contributed to:

I am currently a contributor or author of the following articles on CZ:

Initial Author

Author/Contributor:

Contributor:

I am responsible for the creation of these templates:

Additionally, I contributed to these templates:

I performed levels of relentless editing on these articles:

Additionally I created the following images:

I modified the following photos for article usage:

Philosophies

Humor

In contrast to the serious efforts of projects, I find that often ridiculous insignificancies amuse me greatly. Within the scope of CZ, here are a few that I enjoyed.

Neutrality

There are three properties that I believe should be adhered to in the context of this project when it comes to non-philosophical topics: fact, relevancy, and neutrality.

  • Fact: Everything that pertains to a particular subject should not be made up or speculated on. There should be no lies and no conjecture. I believe in trails, audits, and observations. That which is shown to be absolutely provable.
  • Relevancy: There will always be a percentage of information which points to a demonstratable conclusion. Only the upmost definitive evidence that shows A leads to B should be included.
  • Neutrality: Every viewpoint should be shown, and substantiated with credible sources. Credibile does not mean "existing", "popular", or "notable"; but rather those sources that are known to exhibit only the observable and objective truth and not an agenda or bias. Documentation is a must.

It is the reponsibility for everyone who wishes to further the knowledge and education of the masses to provide the basis for others to make their own decisions. One should be "informative" and not "convincing" when it comes to the essential elements of knowledge.