User:Nancy Sculerati/Approval Editor's Approval Process sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (start with these two questions) |
imported>D. Matt Innis mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Okay Nancy, those last two were good examples of ones that you had to make a choice of whether the editors would have approved. How do you feel about making that decision? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 20:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | Okay Nancy, those last two were good examples of ones that you had to make a choice of whether the editors would have approved. How do you feel about making that decision? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 20:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
We could always allow the Approval Editor to make the decision with the prerequisite that if there is any problem we immediately put it back - no questions asked. Of course, we | We could always allow the Approval Editor to make the decision with the prerequisite that if there is any problem we immediately put it back - no questions asked. Of course, we could have also done that with the constable, too. Thoughts? --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 20:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 10 May 2007
Here you go. Do you want me to make my own or use this one. --Matt Innis (Talk) 16:36, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
- Fire away- we can all use this one. Nancy Sculerati 16:37, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
Okay Nancy, those last two were good examples of ones that you had to make a choice of whether the editors would have approved. How do you feel about making that decision? --Matt Innis (Talk) 20:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
We could always allow the Approval Editor to make the decision with the prerequisite that if there is any problem we immediately put it back - no questions asked. Of course, we could have also done that with the constable, too. Thoughts? --Matt Innis (Talk) 20:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)