User:Approval Manager/How does your workgroup measure up?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Approval Manager m (→Data) |
imported>D. Matt Innis m (moved User:Approvals Manager/How does your workgroup measure up? to User:Approval Manager/How does your workgroup measure up?: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Approvals Manager" to "[[User:Approval...) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 20:18, 11 August 2011
Data
| Workgroup | Total articles | Developed # | Developed % | Approved # | Approved % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astronomy | 389 | 13 | 3.3% | 0 | 0% |
| Biology | 1,640 | 104 | 6.3% | 25 | 1.5% |
| Chemistry | 959 | 62 | 6.5% | 34 | 3.5% |
| Earth Sciences | 199 | 17 | 8.5% | 3 | 1.5% |
| Mathematics | 910 | 45 | 4.9% | 16 | 1.8% |
| Physics | 896 | 56 | 6.3% | 16 | 1.8% |
| Anthropology | 355 | 20 | 5.6% | 3 | 0.8% |
| Economics | 416 | 51 | 12.3% | 12 | 2.9% |
| Geography | 1,504 | 32 | 2.1% | 1 | 0.1% |
| Law | 565 | 21 | 3.7% | 3 | 0.5% |
| Linguistics | 423 | 17 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Politics | 2,368 | 185 | 7.8% | 19 | 0.8% |
| Psychology | 286 | 11 | 3.8% | 0 | 0% |
| Sociology | 492 | 34 | 6.9% | 11 | 2.2% |
| Classics | 197 | 23 | 11.7% | 3 | 1.5% |
| History | 3,269 | 462 | 14.1% | 42 | 1.3% |
| Literature | 866 | 96 | 11.1% | 2 | 0.2% |
| Philosophy | 400 | 17 | 4.3% | 1 | 0.3% |
| Religion | 635 | 45 | 7.1% | 1 | 0.2% |
| Architecture | 156 | 13 | 8.3% | 1 | 0.6% |
| Music | 769 | 11 | 1.4% | 3 | 0.4% |
| Visual Arts | 323 | 22 | 6.8% | 0 | 0% |
| Agriculture | 171 | 11 | 6.4% | 2 | 1.2% |
| Business | 386 | 30 | 7.8% | 3 | 0.8% |
| Computers | 1,168 | 42 | 3.6% | 11 | 0.9% |
| Engineering | 1,389 | 73 | 5.3% | 36 | 2.6% |
| Health Sciences | 2,155 | 71 | 3.3% | 9 | 0.4% |
| Media | 482 | 23 | 4.8% | 4 | 0.8% |
| Military | 2,655 | 227 | 8.5% | 9 | 0.3% |
| Games | 177 | 9 | 5.1% | 3 | 1.7% |
| Hobbies | 199 | 16 | 8% | 3 | 1.5% |
| Sports | 374 | 2 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.8% |
| Citizendium project | 17,707 | 1,149 | 6.5% | 0 | 0% |
For technical reasons, a few workgroups have had to be omitted. Those left out are small workgroups with little activity: Robotics, Library and Information Science, Journalism, Theater, Archaeology, Food Science and Education.