Talk:Terrorism/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
No edit summary
imported>D. Matt Innis
Line 26: Line 26:
==Approval area==
==Approval area==


This artcle is first nominated for approval by Politics editor [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] using the individual approval method. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 20:48, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
This artcle is first nominated version 100127060 for approval by Politics editor [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] using the individual approval method. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 20:48, 29 June 2007 (CDT)


== Images ==
== Images ==

Revision as of 20:48, 29 June 2007


Toapprove.png
Richard Jensen has nominated the version dated 21:44, 29 June 2007 (CDT) of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Military Workgroup and Politics Workgroup are overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on 20070705.


Article Checklist for "Terrorism/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Military Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --Charles Sandberg 14:12, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Approval area

This artcle is first nominated version 100127060 for approval by Politics editor Richard Jensen using the individual approval method. --Matt Innis (Talk) 20:48, 29 June 2007 (CDT)

Images

Want any more for this? Stephen Ewen 00:21, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

Yes this could use some more images. --Charles Sandberg 05:45, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
Charles, about the AK-47 image caption. "...low cost and high numbers." I would recommend a chance to "...low cost and high availability." Additionally, if the AK-47 is a highly reliable weapon, it's probably worthy of mention as a reason why it's popular.--Robert W King 09:13, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
Done --Charles Sandberg 15:46, 28 June 2007 (CDT)