Talk:NuScale small modular reactor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:26, 16 June 2022

Citable Version ^[?]

To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.

Definition: A smaller version of a standard Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) with additional safety features.^[1] [d] [e]

Checklist and Archives

Workgroup categories: Physics and Engineering [Editors asked to check categories]
Subgroup category: Nuclear Engineering
Talk Archive: none	English language variant: American English

Unused subpages
Unused subpages: - Related Articles - Bibliography - External Links - Works - Discography - Filmography - Catalogs - Timelines - Gallery - Audio - Video - Code - Tutorials - Student Level - Signed Articles - Function - Addendum - Debate Guide - Advanced - Recipes - Citable Version

There is a paper in the May issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:
Nuclear waste from small modular reactors
and a response from NuScale at:
https://newsroom.nuscalepower.com/news

L.M. Krall, et.al., Nuclear waste from small modular reactors Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol.119, No.23, 31 May 2022.
- Dan Yurman's critique of Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs 31 May 2022.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{subpages}}
+== Waste Management ==
+There is a paper in the May issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:<br>
+[https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2111833119 Nuclear waste from small modular reactors]<br>
+and a response from NuScale at:<br>
+https://newsroom.nuscalepower.com/news
+*L.M. Krall, et.al., [https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2111833119 Nuclear waste from small modular reactors] Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol.119, No.23, 31 May 2022.
+**Dan Yurman's critique of [https://neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31/stanfords-questionable-study-on-spent-nuclear-fuel-for-smrs/ Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs] 31 May 2022.