Talk:Labrador Retriever: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati
No edit summary
imported>Nancy Sculerati
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
I tried to fix those colums. If you can - do. If you can't, please delete the text and keep the headings. We can write it from scratch and be better off. My opinion.[[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 13:49, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
I tried to fix those colums. If you can - do. If you can't, please delete the text and keep the headings. We can write it from scratch and be better off. My opinion.[[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 13:49, 2 April 2007 (CDT)


I think the entire business about "silver" labs should go. There are odd colors promoted in every breed, no reason to feature that here-it has no great importance. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 13:51, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
I think the entire business about "silver" labs should go. There are odd colors promoted in every breed (not recognized-of course), no reason to feature that here-it has no great importance. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 13:51, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:54, 2 April 2007

A very worthwhile import-but-let's get rid of the columns, please. A lot of the color stuff can go in Dog colors. I know that article is just a stub-the article Horse colors is better developed. Many of the genes are the same-and include the explanation for the Dudley-I believe. I'd say, in this text, brutally cull anything you think is controversial or confusing and we start from there. Nancy Sculerati 13:36, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

I tried to fix those colums. If you can - do. If you can't, please delete the text and keep the headings. We can write it from scratch and be better off. My opinion.Nancy Sculerati 13:49, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

I think the entire business about "silver" labs should go. There are odd colors promoted in every breed (not recognized-of course), no reason to feature that here-it has no great importance. Nancy Sculerati 13:51, 2 April 2007 (CDT)