Talk:Ear: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Supten Sarbadhikari
No edit summary
imported>Supten Sarbadhikari
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 = Needs category
|                cat2 = Needs category
|          cat_check = y
|          cat_check = n
|              status =  
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]]
|                  by = [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]]
}}
}}

Revision as of 23:32, 8 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Ear"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup, Needs category Workgroup, [[:CZ:{{{cat3}}} Workgroup|{{{cat3}}} Workgroup]] [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Supten

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





[[Category:{{{cat3}}} Category Check|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Advanced Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Developed Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Advanced Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Developing Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Stub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} External Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Underlinked Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Cleanup|The ear]]

Classification

Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place in the article for the discussion of non-human vertebrates--not even other mammals. Is the article talking only about vertebrates. And shouldn't the first ref be an anatomical authority, not a 4 p. clinical review? DavidGoodman 21:57, 2 November 2006 (CST)