Talk:Ear: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>DavidGoodman
(qys about scope)
 
imported>Supten Sarbadhikari
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = The ear
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 = Needs category
|          cat_check = y
|              status =
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten]]
}}
==Classification==
Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place
Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place
in the article for the discussion of  
in the article for the discussion of  

Revision as of 23:28, 8 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Ear"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup, Needs category Workgroup, [[:CZ:{{{cat3}}} Workgroup|{{{cat3}}} Workgroup]] [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Not specified
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Supten

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





[[Category:{{{cat3}}} Category Check|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Advanced Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Developed Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Advanced Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Developing Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Nonstub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Stub Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Internal Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} External Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Underlinked Articles|The ear]] [[Category:{{{cat3}}} Cleanup|The ear]]

Classification

Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place in the article for the discussion of non-human vertebrates--not even other mammals. Is the article talking only about vertebrates. And shouldn't the first ref be an anatomical authority, not a 4 p. clinical review? DavidGoodman 21:57, 2 November 2006 (CST)