Talk:Documentary hypothesis: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joshua Zambrano
imported>Bruce M. Tindall
Line 5: Line 5:
The page is gradually starting to take shape, slowly but surely. It still has a LOT of work to be done, in analyzing more of the alleged inconsistencies, and providing a section on criticism, as well as another possible section on support or level of support among scholars - I need to think through what else to include. This is a start that I need to work on; and am nowhere near finished, but it's got a basis now anyway. --[[User:Joshua Zambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 00:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
The page is gradually starting to take shape, slowly but surely. It still has a LOT of work to be done, in analyzing more of the alleged inconsistencies, and providing a section on criticism, as well as another possible section on support or level of support among scholars - I need to think through what else to include. This is a start that I need to work on; and am nowhere near finished, but it's got a basis now anyway. --[[User:Joshua Zambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 00:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
:I am making sure to source everything heavily as I go along, making the going slow, but it should be worth it. --[[User:Joshua Zambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 00:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
:I am making sure to source everything heavily as I go along, making the going slow, but it should be worth it. --[[User:Joshua Zambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 00:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
::Virtually all of the "sources" are tendentious, sectarian organizations or publishers. By labeling certain claims "erroneous," the article would appear to fail to adhere to Citizendium's policy of neutrality and objectivity. A tract is not an encyclopedia article. [[User:Bruce M. Tindall|Bruce M. Tindall]] 01:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:19, 13 March 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition "The theory (based on source-critical arguments) that the Pentateuch is written by four separate authors rather than by one (Moses)." [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Well

The page is gradually starting to take shape, slowly but surely. It still has a LOT of work to be done, in analyzing more of the alleged inconsistencies, and providing a section on criticism, as well as another possible section on support or level of support among scholars - I need to think through what else to include. This is a start that I need to work on; and am nowhere near finished, but it's got a basis now anyway. --Joshua Zambrano 00:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

I am making sure to source everything heavily as I go along, making the going slow, but it should be worth it. --Joshua Zambrano 00:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Virtually all of the "sources" are tendentious, sectarian organizations or publishers. By labeling certain claims "erroneous," the article would appear to fail to adhere to Citizendium's policy of neutrality and objectivity. A tract is not an encyclopedia article. Bruce M. Tindall 01:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)