Talk:Culture jamming: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
imported>Christopher J. Reiss
No edit summary
 
Line 7: Line 7:
I zapped that line, but can't think of another to replace it.  Stilts the flow a bit, *shrugs.  [[User:Christopher J. Reiss|Christopher J. Reiss]] 15:29, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
I zapped that line, but can't think of another to replace it.  Stilts the flow a bit, *shrugs.  [[User:Christopher J. Reiss|Christopher J. Reiss]] 15:29, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
:Keep in mind, we don't use acronyms or phrases here; there is no "NPOV" or "POV" policy, but articles should be relatively neutral and unbiased. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:48, 12 March 2008 (CDT)
:Keep in mind, we don't use acronyms or phrases here; there is no "NPOV" or "POV" policy, but articles should be relatively neutral and unbiased. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:48, 12 March 2008 (CDT)
Gotcha.  A good policy, to prevent "in-speak", the first step towards cabalism.  Old habits die hard i guess.  [[User:Christopher J. Reiss|Christopher J. Reiss]] 12:50, 12 March 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 12:50, 12 March 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Tactic in which an activist attempts to disrupt or subvert mainstream cultural institutions or corporate advertising. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Media [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

"Often with considerable finesse and cleverness"--that's debatable, isn't it? --Larry Sanger 14:20, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

It does seem a bit POV, let me soften it ...Christopher J. Reiss 15:10, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

I zapped that line, but can't think of another to replace it. Stilts the flow a bit, *shrugs. Christopher J. Reiss 15:29, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

Keep in mind, we don't use acronyms or phrases here; there is no "NPOV" or "POV" policy, but articles should be relatively neutral and unbiased. --Robert W King 12:48, 12 March 2008 (CDT)

Gotcha. A good policy, to prevent "in-speak", the first step towards cabalism. Old habits die hard i guess. Christopher J. Reiss 12:50, 12 March 2008 (CDT)