Talk:Computer architecture: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Andy Philpotts
No edit summary
imported>Pat Palmer
(→‎Update to checklist: clarification)
Line 21: Line 21:
== Update to checklist ==
== Update to checklist ==


It seems the article is no longer underlinked, updating the article checklist, I also think this is more than a stub
It seems the article is no longer underlinked, updating the article checklist, I also think this is more than a stub.
 
::It is not a stub anymore, because several sections were moved from [[Computer]] into here.  However, those sections originally came from Wikipedia, so very little has been done to revise this material so far.  I agree with status 2, though.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 11:54, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:54, 26 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Computer architecture"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Andy Philpotts 09:42, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





first comment

Link from Computer is missing. Should IMHO also be part of a Electrical Engineering Workgroup. Except that none exists. --Markus Baumeister 15:22, 9 March 2007 (CST)

moved stuff into here from Computer

I moved a lot of stuff into here. It's a mess right now, and some of it may belong instead in history of computing. But it fits here, for the moment, better than in Computers, which is intended just to be an overview.Pat Palmer 16:10, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

Update to checklist

It seems the article is no longer underlinked, updating the article checklist, I also think this is more than a stub.

It is not a stub anymore, because several sections were moved from Computer into here. However, those sections originally came from Wikipedia, so very little has been done to revise this material so far. I agree with status 2, though.Pat Palmer 11:54, 26 April 2007 (CDT)