Talk:Cleromancy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This article assumes that the
Urim and Tummim the high priest carried in his clothing
were stones. Is this considered generally accepted? [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 00:29, 22 November 2006 (CST)
That's what Halliday says, but from what we know no one can tell for sure. They may have been pieces of bone or some other material. We can circumvent using the word "stones", add a qualification or simply avoid the noun "stones.' [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 10:31, 22 November 2006 (CST)
{{checklist
{{checklist
|                abc = Cleromancy
|                abc = Cleromancy
Line 10: Line 4:
|                cat2 =  
|                cat2 =  
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = Y
|          cat_check = N
|              status = 2
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = Y
|        underlinked = Y
Line 16: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 10:39, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 10:39, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
This article assumes that the
Urim and Tummim the high priest carried in his clothing
were stones. Is this considered generally accepted? [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 00:29, 22 November 2006 (CST)
That's what Halliday says, but from what we know no one can tell for sure. They may have been pieces of bone or some other material. We can circumvent using the word "stones", add a qualification or simply avoid the noun "stones.' [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 10:31, 22 November 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 16:11, 15 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Cleromancy"
Workgroup category or categories Religion Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by David Martin 10:39, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article assumes that the Urim and Tummim the high priest carried in his clothing were stones. Is this considered generally accepted? DavidGoodman 00:29, 22 November 2006 (CST)

That's what Halliday says, but from what we know no one can tell for sure. They may have been pieces of bone or some other material. We can circumvent using the word "stones", add a qualification or simply avoid the noun "stones.' Ori Redler 10:31, 22 November 2006 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Cleromancy&oldid=105463"