Talk:Abelian group: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Spector (→Suggested change in notation for abelian map groups: new section) |
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→Suggested change in notation for abelian map groups: Agree, and did) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I don't want to make this edit myself, as I'm not very familiar with CZ policies yet. [[User:David Spector|David Spector]] 03:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC) | I don't want to make this edit myself, as I'm not very familiar with CZ policies yet. [[User:David Spector|David Spector]] 03:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Agree, and did. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 21:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 18 April 2010
Suggested change in notation for abelian map groups
The notation is impossible to understand unless you are familiar with maps, which is not very likely if you want to know what abelian groups are.
Why not make this idea more accessible to everyone by changing it to f(g(x))=g(f(x)) for all x in the domain of the functions?
I don't want to make this edit myself, as I'm not very familiar with CZ policies yet. David Spector 03:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Agree, and did. Boris Tsirelson 21:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)