Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- In [[diagnostic test]]s, the '''likelihood ratio''' is the likelihood that a clinical [[sign (medical)|sign]] is in a patien :<math>\text{Likelihood ratio} = \frac{\mbox{probability of test result with disease}}{\mbox{probability5 KB (738 words) - 20:35, 15 August 2012
- 164 bytes (22 words) - 20:22, 7 September 2009
- Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Likelihood ratio]]. Needs checking by a human.643 bytes (79 words) - 18:05, 11 January 2010
Page text matches
- ...d tactile vocal [[fremitus]] made pleural effusion less likely (negative [[likelihood ratio]], 0.21)" according to a [[systematic review]] by the [http://sgim.org/inde1 KB (136 words) - 13:34, 13 March 2009
- In [[diagnostic test]]s, the '''likelihood ratio''' is the likelihood that a clinical [[sign (medical)|sign]] is in a patien :<math>\text{Likelihood ratio} = \frac{\mbox{probability of test result with disease}}{\mbox{probability5 KB (738 words) - 20:35, 15 August 2012
- :<i>posterior odds equals prior odds times likelihood ratio</i>, or The "likelihood ratio" or "Bayes factor" for these two hypotheses, given the data <math>D</math>,3 KB (601 words) - 11:23, 26 January 2011
- {{r|Likelihood ratio}}438 bytes (56 words) - 19:36, 11 January 2010
- |+ [[Likelihood ratio]]s for common tests<ref name="pmid1487761">{{cite journal |author=Guyatt GH ! [[Likelihood ratio]]3 KB (418 words) - 21:29, 3 January 2010
- Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Likelihood ratio]]. Needs checking by a human.643 bytes (79 words) - 18:05, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Likelihood ratio}}801 bytes (97 words) - 20:36, 11 January 2010
- |+ [[Likelihood ratio]]s for common tests<ref name="pmid1487761">{{cite journal |author=Guyatt GH ! [[Likelihood ratio]]4 KB (627 words) - 16:36, 22 December 2014
- ...ratio]]=9.0) and a blood–ascitic fluid pH gradient of 0.10 or greater ([[likelihood ratio]]=11.3) were the most accurate thresholds for diagnosing [[spontaneous bact4 KB (520 words) - 09:04, 13 June 2010
- The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) is based on the [[likelihood ratio]]s.<ref name="pmid14615004">{{cite journal |author=Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prin Whereas the [[likelihood ratio]] is:<ref name="urlAsk the EBM Expert! - Society of General and Internal Me18 KB (2,610 words) - 05:45, 15 March 2024
- ...null hypothesis, but is a ratio of probabilities. The Bayes Factor is a [[likelihood ratio]]. A value greater than 1 supports the null hypotheses, whereas a value les ...mum Bayes Factor when p = 0.05, or Z= 1.96, is 0.15. It corresponds to the likelihood ratio for comparing the hypotheses that the mean is zero of a normally distribute18 KB (2,448 words) - 05:50, 13 June 2011
- |+ [[Likelihood ratio]]s for common tests<ref name="pmid1487761">{{cite journal |author=Guyatt GH ! [[Likelihood ratio]]14 KB (1,989 words) - 13:18, 2 February 2023
- ...ivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]+ !! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]-19 KB (2,555 words) - 09:02, 13 June 2010
- ...theorem | Bayes' rule]]: posterior [[odds]] equals prior [[odds]] times [[likelihood ratio]]. They just have to check that under the two competing hypotheses (whether12 KB (2,083 words) - 16:41, 18 February 2021
- This leads to a negative [[likelihood ratio]] of 0.35 which indicates the test, when the patient does not respond to tr16 KB (2,030 words) - 17:35, 10 February 2024
- : See also [[Bayes Theorem]], [[sensitivity and specificity]], and [[likelihood ratio]].36 KB (5,130 words) - 20:23, 15 August 2012
- * [[Likelihood ratio]]s55 KB (7,444 words) - 06:21, 29 August 2013
- ...elp diagnose migraine. If 4 of the 5 criteria are met, then the positive [[likelihood ratio]] for diagnosing migraine is 24.<ref name="pmid16968852">{{cite journal |au26 KB (3,466 words) - 20:38, 20 March 2014
- * [[Likelihood ratio]]s63 KB (8,790 words) - 06:57, 2 March 2021
- * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio +]] 8.6 * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio -]] 0.2670 KB (9,828 words) - 17:34, 10 February 2024