Related changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide anonymous users | Hide my edits | Show bots | Hide minor edits
Show new changes starting from 09:28, 4 May 2024
   
Page name:
List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

4 May 2024

 m   08:11  Central Intelligence Agency diffhist −4 Pat Palmer talk contribs (Text replacement - "counterintelligence" to "counterintelligence")

3 May 2024

     09:41  (Deletion log) [Pat Palmer‎ (2×)]
     
09:41 Pat Palmer talk contribs deleted page El-Masri v. Tenet
     
09:34 Pat Palmer talk contribs deleted page Khaled el-Masri/Related Articles
     09:33  U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit diffhist −193 Pat Palmer talk contribs (words like "recently" are not helpful in an encyclopedia)

23 April 2024

 m   08:57  Central Intelligence Agency diffhist −8 Pat Palmer talk contribs (Text replacement - "CIA activities in Europe and Russia" to "CIA activities in Europe and Russia")

21 April 2024

 m   11:12  Central Intelligence Agency‎‎ 2 changes history +34 [Pat Palmer‎ (2×)]
 m   
11:12 (cur | prev) 0 Pat Palmer talk contribs
 m   
11:10 (cur | prev) +34 Pat Palmer talk contribs

6 April 2024

     15:08 Deletion log John Leach talk contribs deleted page State secrets privilege(content was: "{{subpages}} In U.S. law, the '''state secrets principle''' is a legal doctrine that allows evidence from being made public during trials, or, in some cases, an entire case to be dismissed, because information critical to national security would be revealed. Some interpretations regard it as absolute, and derived from the President's Article II authority as Commander-in-Chief, claiming that the Constitution did not intend the courts to be a check and balance on the unique P...")