S.S. Manhattan: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>George Swan
(first draft)
 
m (Text replacement - "United States" to "United States of America")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
The '''S.S. Manhattan''' was an ice-strengthened [[super-tanker]] American oil interests tried to send through the [[Northwest Passage]] in 1968.<ref name=SydneyMorningHerald20080804>
The '''S.S. Manhattan''' was an ice-strengthened [[super-tanker]] American oil interests tried to send through the [[Northwest Passage]] in 1968.<ref name=SydneyMorningHerald20080804>{{cite journal|last=Zorzetto|first=Alicia|title=The Dispute over the Northwest Passage|url=http://www1.american.edu/ted/ice/northwest-passage.htm|publisher=American University|journal=ICE Case Studies|issue=185|date=May 2006|accessdate=4 October 2013|quote=}}</ref><ref name=PetroleumNews20071125>
{{cite news
{{cite news
| url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/cold-rush-for-arctics-energy-riches/2008/08/03/1217701855427.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
| url=http://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/230239803.shtml
| title=Cold Rush for Arctic's energy riches
| title=Breaking through the ice
| publisher=[[Sydney Morning Herald]]
| publisher=[[Petroleum News]]
| author=[[Marion Wilkinson]]
| volume=12
| date=2008-08-04
| issue=47
| accessdate=2008-08-11
| author=
| date=2007-11-25
| accessdate=2008-08-14
| quote=
| quote=
}} [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smh.com.au%2Fnews%2Fenvironment%2Fcold-rush-for-arctics-energy-riches%2F2008%2F08%2F03%2F1217701855427.html%3Fpage%3Dfullpage%23contentSwap1&date=2008-08-11 mirror]
}}  
</ref>
</ref>


Although [[Canada]] and the [[United States]] are allies in other areas they are in a dispute as to the nature of the Northwest Passage.<ref name=SydneyMorningHerald20080804/>   
The [[Finland|Finnish]] [[icebreaker]] firm [[Aker Arctic Technology]] modified the ''Manhattan'' for ice conditions.<ref name=PetroleumNews20071125/>
Icebreakers Aker designed following this work included features first included during the Manhattan refit.
 
Although [[Canada]] and the [[United States of America]] are allies in other areas they are in a dispute as to the nature of the Northwest Passage.<ref name=SydneyMorningHerald20080804/>   
The USA asserts the passage should be considered an International shipping channel, that vessels of all nations should be able to proceed through without regulation from any nation.  Canada asserts that the passages are internal waters and that Canada has the right and responsibility to enforce environmental safety measures there.
The USA asserts the passage should be considered an International shipping channel, that vessels of all nations should be able to proceed through without regulation from any nation.  Canada asserts that the passages are internal waters and that Canada has the right and responsibility to enforce environmental safety measures there.


Line 18: Line 23:


==References==
==References==
<references/>
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 14:06, 2 February 2023

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The S.S. Manhattan was an ice-strengthened super-tanker American oil interests tried to send through the Northwest Passage in 1968.[1][2]

The Finnish icebreaker firm Aker Arctic Technology modified the Manhattan for ice conditions.[2] Icebreakers Aker designed following this work included features first included during the Manhattan refit.

Although Canada and the United States of America are allies in other areas they are in a dispute as to the nature of the Northwest Passage.[1] The USA asserts the passage should be considered an International shipping channel, that vessels of all nations should be able to proceed through without regulation from any nation. Canada asserts that the passages are internal waters and that Canada has the right and responsibility to enforce environmental safety measures there.

The oil interests behind the voyage of the Manhattan pointedly did not file a sailing plan with Canada. Canada stopped short of blocking the vessel, but did escort it with Canadian Coast Guard icebreakers.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Zorzetto, Alicia (May 2006). "The Dispute over the Northwest Passage". ICE Case Studies (185). Retrieved on 4 October 2013.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Breaking through the ice, Petroleum News, 2007-11-25. Retrieved on 2008-08-14.