European Union: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 13: Line 13:


==Rationale==
==Rationale==
The principal economic advantage of membership to a country has been seen as the unrestricted  access that it provides to wider markets for its products. The adoption of a common currency as part of the Economic and Monetary Union was seen as  further lowering  barriers to those markets by reducing transaction costs and eliminating [[exchange rate risk]]s. It was generally accepted  that there could be  offsetting  disadvantages arising from  loss of control over the domestic economy, but  most of the continent's governments  judged the balance to be positive. Some have since come to question that judgement because of the unsymmetrical impact of recent [[demand shock]]s upon the domestic economies of member countries.
Although it started as an economic association, the anticipation  of economic benefits was not the only rationale that inspired its founders. It was also seen as a means of bringing political stability to a Europe that had  been torn apart by  two world wars in the course of the previous 50 years. That advantage has since been taken for granted,  and its rationale has been perceived mainly in terms of economic advantage. 
 
The principal economic advantage of membership to a country has been seen as the unrestricted  access that it provides to wider markets for its products. The adoption of a common currency as part of the Economic and Monetary Union was seen as  further lowering  barriers to those markets by reducing transaction costs and eliminating [[exchange rate risk]]s. Some of the Union's smaller members may also have anticipated further advantages arising from the improvement in their creditworthiness that membership would generate.  It was generally accepted  that there could be  offsetting  disadvantages arising from  loss of control over the domestic economy, but  most of the continent's governments  judged the balance to be positive. Some have since come to question that judgement because of the unsymmetrical impact of recent [[demand shock]]s upon the domestic economies of member countries.


==Constitution==
==Constitution==

Revision as of 09:56, 14 December 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The European Union (EU) is a political and economic entity consisting of 27 member states that share a common political ideology. In legal form, it is a complex hybrid structure with elements of federalism (such as the European Court of Justice and the European Parliament), intergovernmentalism (the Council of Ministers) and some characteristics of an international organsation (the European Commission represents the Union in certain international negotiations). It has grown from the six founding member states of the European Economic Community in 1957, through many accessions of new members — especially, in recent years, much of the former European Communist bloc.

Overview

Determined to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe, ... we are agreed ...
preamble to the Treaty of Rome[1] by the heads of state of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and The Netherlands.

The transition from the European Common Market of 1957 to the European Union of 2011 - that is summarised on the timelines subpage of this article - has involved a major deepening and widening of coooperation among the countries of Europe. Among the most recent of the moves toward the founders' objective of economic and political union was the creation by the Maastricht Treaty of an economic and monetary union, to form in 1999 what came to be knowm as the eurozone. Two of the existing members of the European Union (The United Kingdom and Denmark) were unwilling at the time to accept the surrender of control over monetary policy that was required of eurozone members, but willingness to join the eurozone became a condition of membership of the European Union for subsequent applicants. The Maastricht Treaty required all members of the European Union to relinquish a limited degree of control over their fiscal policies by abiding by agreed limits on their budget deficits and their public debt. The widening of tne scope of membership, from 6 countries ,in 1957 to 27 in 2011 has involved a further surrender of national sovereignty because it has been accompanied by a widening of the range of policy issues that are decided by majority voting, and thus a reduction of the degree of influence that any country can exert upon the policies of the Union.

The development of the eurozone crisis in the aftermath of the Great Recession has added to the urgency of the onegoing debate concerning the desireability of further surrenders of national sovereignty. There is a widely-held view that a major increase in the degree of central control over fiscal policy would be needed to solve the problems raised by that crisis, but there is uncertainty about the willingness of people to accept the implied reduction in their influence over public expenditure and taxation. Since there seems to be little prospect that all of the existing member countries of the European Union would accept such a development, it would appear necessary, on that view, to envisage a number of departures from the eurozone.

Rationale

Although it started as an economic association, the anticipation of economic benefits was not the only rationale that inspired its founders. It was also seen as a means of bringing political stability to a Europe that had been torn apart by two world wars in the course of the previous 50 years. That advantage has since been taken for granted, and its rationale has been perceived mainly in terms of economic advantage.

The principal economic advantage of membership to a country has been seen as the unrestricted access that it provides to wider markets for its products. The adoption of a common currency as part of the Economic and Monetary Union was seen as further lowering barriers to those markets by reducing transaction costs and eliminating exchange rate risks. Some of the Union's smaller members may also have anticipated further advantages arising from the improvement in their creditworthiness that membership would generate. It was generally accepted that there could be offsetting disadvantages arising from loss of control over the domestic economy, but most of the continent's governments judged the balance to be positive. Some have since come to question that judgement because of the unsymmetrical impact of recent demand shocks upon the domestic economies of member countries.

Constitution

The term "european constitution" commonly refers to a document[1] published in 2004, whose proposals have not been given formal effect because they have not received universal ratification. In the absence of an accepted codification, the constitution of the European Union consists of a collection of treaties, protocols, declarations and regulations. Notwithstanding its lack of status, the document of 2004 provides a valuable summary of the existing position as perceived by its authors.

The conditions for membership of the Union are defined in the document in two clauses:

Article I-58: The Union shall be open to all European States which respect the values referred to in Article I-2, and are committed to promoting them;

and,
Article I-2: The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.

Those joining after 1992 are also expected to meet the eurozone entry criteria.

Exclusive competence is ascribed to the Union as regards:

- the customs union, competition rules, monetary policy (for eurozone members), conservation of marine biological resources, the common commercial policy, and certain (defined) categories of international agreement.

Shared competence between the Union and member states is deemed to apply to:

- internal markets, specified aspects of social policy, economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and fisheries, the environment, consumer protection, transport, trans-European networks, energy, freedom, security and justice, and public health.

Most decisions by the Union's governing body are taken by a qualified majority, defined as at least 55 per cent of the members of the Council(72 per cent for proposals from other than the Commission or the Union Minister of Foreign Affars), comprising at least fifteen of them and representing member states comprising at least 65 % of the population of the Union. Exceptions include decisions on foreign and defence policy, the Union budget, the admission of new members, emergency financial assistance to members and penalties for breaches of the Union's rules.

Structure

The principal institutions of the European Union are

  • The European Council[2] Heads of State or Government of the Member States, together with its President and the President of the Commission (and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy if required.)
  • The Council of the European Union[3] - the main decision-making body of the EU (ministers of the member states - foreign affairs, finance, social affairs, transport, agriculture, etc.).
  • The European Parliament[4] - a directly-elected body that takes legislative decisions on some issues jointly with the Council of Ministers.
  • The European Commission[5] - the driving force in proposing legislation (to Parliament and the Council), administering and implementing EU policies, enforcing EU law (jointly with the Court of Justice) and negotiating in the international arena.
  • The European Central Bank[6] - executes the EU's monetary policy.
  • The European Court of Justice[7] - the judicial authority of the European Union which reviews the legality of the acts of the institutions of the European Union, ensures that the Member States comply with obligations under the Treaties, and interprets European Union law at the request of the national courts and tribunals.
PD Image
Countries of the EU as of January 1, 2007

Membership

To the 6 founder members in 1951, 1 was added in 1981, 2 in 1986, 4 in 1995, 10 more in 2004 and a further 2 in 2007 - (see the lists on the timelines subpage)

The 27 member countries are:

Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

The candidate countries are:

Croatia, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey and Iceland.

Potential candidates are:

Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo under UN Security Council Resolution 1244, Montenegro, and Serbia.

Following the signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, 11 European Union members became members of the Eurozone. They were:

Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal and Finland,
Greece joined in 2001, Slovenia in 2007, Cyprus and Malta in 2008 and Slovakia in 2009.

Policies

Agriculture

The protection of the community's agricultural industry from overseas competition by a "Common Agricultural Policy" was among the principle objectives of the founders of the Europeam Common Market (as set out in article 39 of the Treaty of Rome), and it is even now the most costly of the activities of the Union, accounting for about 40 per cent of its annual budget [8]. Its principal instruments are price support payments, export subsidies and taxes on agricultural imports. The subsidies were initially production-related but since 2003 they have decoupled from production levels and made dependent on animal welfare and environmental protection. Its principal recipients in 2006 were France (20%), Spain (13%), Germany (13%), and Italy (11%)[9] [10]

Competition

European competition policy is administered directly by the Competition Diectorate of the European Commission[11]

[12]

[13]

Economic and Monetary Policy

Member countries of the eurozone have adopted a common monetary policy determined by the European Central Bank. The remit given to the Bank assigns overriding importance to price stability, but also required it "without prejudice to the objective of price stability" to "support the general economic policies in the Community" including a "high level of employment" and "sustainable and non-inflationary growth"[14]. Member countries of the European Union that are not members of the Eurozone are free to conduct their own monetary policy. The [[fiscal policy|fiscal policies of all European Union member countries are conducted independently but they are required to keep within the limits on public debt and budget deficit stipulated in the Stability and Growth Pact[15] [16].

Other policy areas

There are also departments of the European Commission that develop policy on climate action, communication, culture, employment, energy, environment,foreign affairs, health, justice, science and technology, transport and tourism.

Recent developments

The economies of all member countries suffered major downturns during the Great Recession of 2007-10 (as described on the Addendum subpage of the article on that subject). One effect of the recession was to reduce revenues from taxation and increase public expenditure, as a result of which there were increases in member countries' budget deficits and public debt, and multiple breaches of the limits required by the Stability and Growth Pact. Particular concern developed in early 2010 concerning the fiscal sustainability of the economies of the "PIIGS" countries (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain) following rating downgrades by the credit rating agencies (their problems are described in the article on the eurozone crisis). In May 2010, a €500 billion European financial stabilisation mechanism was established[17], enabling member states in difficulties to get loans from the European Central Bank (subject to the adoption of measures to restore fiscal sustainability) and the Bank launched a securities market programme, designed to calm the bond market[18]. During 2010, the governments of Greece and Ireland decided that, without help, they would not be able to continue to finance their budget deficits, and they sought - and received - loans from other European governments. Those loans failed to reassure potential investors, and in November and December of 2010 the international bond market forced further increases in interest rates on the governments of all five governments (including those of Portugal, Spain and Italy, because of fears of contagion from Greece and Ireland).

Prospects

By December 2010, there was widespread uncertainty about future prospects for the eurozone and beyond. There were doubts about the willingness of European governments to provide further financial support to the five "PIIGS" governments, and speculation that financing difficulties might spread to affect other governments. Some commentators considered it inevitable that one or other of the PIIGS governments would default on, or restructure, its loans, and other commentators forecast departures from the eurozone by governments wishing to escape its restraints. There were even those who envisaged wholesale departures, leading to a collapse of the common currency - an outcome that would impose substantial losses upon countries with investments in euro-denominated securities, and could threaten the stability of the international financial system.

Further crisis prevention measures were under consideration in December 2010. The leaders of Frances and German were again calling for further moves toward political integration [19], and the two governments announced that they would jointly table structural answers to the eurozone crisis "in the first weeks of the new year".

References