Deterrence: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Caesar Schinas
m (Robot: Changing template: TOC-right)
m (Text replacement - "]]" to "")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}
{{TOC|right}}
'''Deterrence''' is a set of actions or positions that persuade an opponent not to take some action. While its most common usage is in military and political strategy, its roots are in game theory. The opposite, and less commonly discussed approach is compellence, a set of actions that forces an adversary to take some action.
'''Deterrence''' is a set of actions or positions that persuade an opponent not to take some action. While its most common usage is in military and political strategy, its roots are in [[game theory]]. The opposite, and less commonly discussed approach is [[compellence]], a set of actions that forces an adversary to take some action.


==Legal context==
==Legal context==
[[Restraining order]]s are deterrence mechanisms implemented through courts.
Restraining orders are deterrence mechanisms implemented through courts.


==Mutual assured destruction==
==Mutual assured destruction==
Line 10: Line 9:


==Attrition==
==Attrition==
[[Attrition]] is a variant on deterrence, in that it does not attempt to prevent the adversary from starting an action, but rather make it so costly to continue the action that the opponent will abandon it.
Attrition is a variant on deterrence, in that it does not attempt to prevent the adversary from starting an action, but rather make it so costly to continue the action that the opponent will abandon it.

Latest revision as of 07:29, 18 March 2024

This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.


This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Deterrence is a set of actions or positions that persuade an opponent not to take some action. While its most common usage is in military and political strategy, its roots are in game theory. The opposite, and less commonly discussed approach is compellence, a set of actions that forces an adversary to take some action.

Legal context

Restraining orders are deterrence mechanisms implemented through courts.

Mutual assured destruction

Perhaps the most famous, or infamous, deterrence strategy apparently succeeded in preventing nuclear warfare between the Soviet Union and the United States. Mutual assured destruction, with the rather appropriate acronym MAD, required each side to have a sufficiently invulnerable set of nuclear weapons, such that any conceivable attack by one side would leave the other with enough weapons to do unacceptable damage to the original attacker.

Attrition

Attrition is a variant on deterrence, in that it does not attempt to prevent the adversary from starting an action, but rather make it so costly to continue the action that the opponent will abandon it.