Crew-served weapon: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "nuclear" to "nuclear") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "man-portable air defense system" to "man-portable air defense system") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
A '''crew-served weapon''' cannot, in practice, be operated by one person. When all preparations have been made, an individual might be able to fire it, but not reload or move it. Some weapons, such as light [[machine gun]]s, can be used briefly as an individual weapon, but a single operator will soon become fatigued, run out of ammunition, etc. While Hollywood has been known to portray action heroes, for example, firing a .50 caliber machine gun held in their hands, a real human being attempting to do so would find himself flat on his back. | A '''crew-served weapon''' cannot, in practice, be operated by one person. When all preparations have been made, an individual might be able to fire it, but not reload or move it. Some weapons, such as light [[machine gun]]s, can be used briefly as an individual weapon, but a single operator will soon become fatigued, run out of ammunition, etc. While Hollywood has been known to portray action heroes, for example, firing a .50 caliber machine gun held in their hands, a real human being attempting to do so would find himself flat on his back. | ||
The most common example would be [[artillery]] larger than a light [[mortar]]. These contrast with individual weapons such as a [[rifle]], [[pistol]], or | The most common example would be [[artillery]] larger than a light [[mortar]]. These contrast with individual weapons such as a [[rifle]], [[pistol]], or man-portable air defense system. | ||
While it is technically possible for one person to operate, for example, a [[howitzer]] or [[mortar]], by carrying out, sequentially, all tasks, the rate of fire would be unlikely to be useful. | While it is technically possible for one person to operate, for example, a [[howitzer]] or [[mortar]], by carrying out, sequentially, all tasks, the rate of fire would be unlikely to be useful. | ||
Some weapons, such as [[guided missile]]s with nuclear [[warhead]]s, are deliberately made, for safety reasons, so that they ''cannot'' be launched by one person. A typical [[intercontinental ballistic missile]] has to have a minimum of two keys turned essentially at the same time, but they are too far apart for any person to reach. | Some weapons, such as [[guided missile]]s with nuclear [[warhead]]s, are deliberately made, for safety reasons, so that they ''cannot'' be launched by one person. A typical [[intercontinental ballistic missile]] has to have a minimum of two keys turned essentially at the same time, but they are too far apart for any person to reach. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:06, 4 April 2024
A crew-served weapon cannot, in practice, be operated by one person. When all preparations have been made, an individual might be able to fire it, but not reload or move it. Some weapons, such as light machine guns, can be used briefly as an individual weapon, but a single operator will soon become fatigued, run out of ammunition, etc. While Hollywood has been known to portray action heroes, for example, firing a .50 caliber machine gun held in their hands, a real human being attempting to do so would find himself flat on his back.
The most common example would be artillery larger than a light mortar. These contrast with individual weapons such as a rifle, pistol, or man-portable air defense system.
While it is technically possible for one person to operate, for example, a howitzer or mortar, by carrying out, sequentially, all tasks, the rate of fire would be unlikely to be useful.
Some weapons, such as guided missiles with nuclear warheads, are deliberately made, for safety reasons, so that they cannot be launched by one person. A typical intercontinental ballistic missile has to have a minimum of two keys turned essentially at the same time, but they are too far apart for any person to reach.