Containment policy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
Going back to the [[Dwight D. Eisenhower|Eisenhower]] administration, there was a commitment to Cold War containment of Communism, which actually began in the [[Harry S Truman|Truman Administration]] with the [[containment policy]] conceived by [[George Kennan]].
Going back to the [[Dwight D. Eisenhower|Eisenhower]] administration, there was a commitment to Cold War containment of Communism, which actually began in the [[Harry S Truman|Truman Administration]] with the [[containment policy]] conceived by [[George Kennan]].


[[Andrew Bacevich]] has suggested applying the principle to [[militant Islam|militant Islamists]].
Kennan's policy came from what variously was called the "Long Telegram", or, as the article appeared pseudonymously in ''Foreign Affairs (magazine)|Foreign Affairs]]'', "The Sources of Soviet Power".  Kennan's basic premise was that the Soviet ideology was based on a dialectic in which they were destined to win, so they would take a long view. While they would push for local victory, they would rarely treat confrontations as existential.
==Successors==
During the Cold War, opponents proposed a more "victory" strategy, one of the keys, for example, in the Truman-Macarthur confrontation. Nevertheless, [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], although this has become more obvious after more documents have been declassified, essentially kept the policy. Supporting the French in Indochina was limited in 1954, and tied to French support for NATO and other containment in Europe.
 
Under [[John F. Kennedy]], more aggressive anticommunism, as with Cuba, came into being, although he stayed more limited, as with [[Laos]], than did [[Lyndon B. Johnson]].
 
A variety of analysts suggest post-Cold War alternatives. <ref>{{citation
| http://www.colby.edu/par/Winter%2000/grand%20strategy.htm
| title = Grand Strategy and the Next President of the United States
| author =  James J. Marquardt | publisher = Colby College
}}</ref>
==New applications==
[[Andrew Bacevich]] has proposed containment of [[radical Islamism]].
==References==
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 11:07, 28 February 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Going back to the Eisenhower administration, there was a commitment to Cold War containment of Communism, which actually began in the Truman Administration with the containment policy conceived by George Kennan.

Kennan's policy came from what variously was called the "Long Telegram", or, as the article appeared pseudonymously in Foreign Affairs (magazine)|Foreign Affairs]], "The Sources of Soviet Power". Kennan's basic premise was that the Soviet ideology was based on a dialectic in which they were destined to win, so they would take a long view. While they would push for local victory, they would rarely treat confrontations as existential.

Successors

During the Cold War, opponents proposed a more "victory" strategy, one of the keys, for example, in the Truman-Macarthur confrontation. Nevertheless, Dwight D. Eisenhower, although this has become more obvious after more documents have been declassified, essentially kept the policy. Supporting the French in Indochina was limited in 1954, and tied to French support for NATO and other containment in Europe.

Under John F. Kennedy, more aggressive anticommunism, as with Cuba, came into being, although he stayed more limited, as with Laos, than did Lyndon B. Johnson.

A variety of analysts suggest post-Cold War alternatives. [1]

New applications

Andrew Bacevich has proposed containment of radical Islamism.

References

  1. James J. Marquardt, Grand Strategy and the Next President of the United States, Colby College