CZ Talk:How to edit an article: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Matthias Röder
imported>Robert W King
Line 3: Line 3:
:I personally find it a practice of disgust, and anything that requires a "citation needed" should be pulled from the article.  It allows for fabrication, rumors, and hearsay.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:04, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
:I personally find it a practice of disgust, and anything that requires a "citation needed" should be pulled from the article.  It allows for fabrication, rumors, and hearsay.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:04, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
::I am not sure I understand what you mean. Sometimes a not so well-known statement or passage may be important to have for an article. In order for others to find out more about this statement a references or citation might be useful. If such a reference does not exist yet, and if I am currently not capable of providing such a citation, how can I make other editors aware of the fact that a citation is needed? Is there a CZ policy on this? Should I put a comment on the talk page? [[User:Matthias Röder|Matthias Röder]] 12:16, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
::I am not sure I understand what you mean. Sometimes a not so well-known statement or passage may be important to have for an article. In order for others to find out more about this statement a references or citation might be useful. If such a reference does not exist yet, and if I am currently not capable of providing such a citation, how can I make other editors aware of the fact that a citation is needed? Is there a CZ policy on this? Should I put a comment on the talk page? [[User:Matthias Röder|Matthias Röder]] 12:16, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
:::If a reference or a citation does not exist for a "not so well-known statement", then doesn't it seem like you can just about fabricate anything?  For instance, I could say "Matthias Röder advocates the stomping of ants(citation needed)".  I can't provide a reference for that, and it certainly '''could''' be a "no so well-known" fact about you despite it's truth or falsehood. 
:::On Wikipedia, anything can be made up and slapped with a "Citation Needed" reference to ensure its inclusion, regardless of truth. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 12:22, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 12:22, 9 August 2007

Citation needed

Hi all! I am editing the article on Johann Sebastian Bach at the moment and I was wondering if there is a way to indicate that a citation or reference is needed for a certain claim or paragraph. I remember that something like this was possible in Wikipedia. Is there something like this on CZ, too? THanks, Matthias Röder 11:52, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

I personally find it a practice of disgust, and anything that requires a "citation needed" should be pulled from the article. It allows for fabrication, rumors, and hearsay.--Robert W King 12:04, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
I am not sure I understand what you mean. Sometimes a not so well-known statement or passage may be important to have for an article. In order for others to find out more about this statement a references or citation might be useful. If such a reference does not exist yet, and if I am currently not capable of providing such a citation, how can I make other editors aware of the fact that a citation is needed? Is there a CZ policy on this? Should I put a comment on the talk page? Matthias Röder 12:16, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
If a reference or a citation does not exist for a "not so well-known statement", then doesn't it seem like you can just about fabricate anything? For instance, I could say "Matthias Röder advocates the stomping of ants(citation needed)". I can't provide a reference for that, and it certainly could be a "no so well-known" fact about you despite it's truth or falsehood.
On Wikipedia, anything can be made up and slapped with a "Citation Needed" reference to ensure its inclusion, regardless of truth. --Robert W King 12:22, 9 August 2007 (CDT)