Talk:Daniel Everette Hale

To do. Please write a brief definition or description of this article at Daniel Everette Hale/Definition.

Metadata here

provenance

This article is entirely my own work, first started in the wikipedia's userspace. The wikipedia now has an article on Hale, started after this draft. I had nothing to do with it, and this article is entirely my work. George Swan (talk) 20:59, 19 May 2022 (CDT)

• Pat, WRT attribution to the wikipedia, as per Feist v Rural, the SCOTUS ruled that ordinary "lists of facts" are not protected by copyright, in the United States. Copyright protection requires at least a "spark of creativity" - their wording.

You added {{WPAttribution}}. I think merely adding references taken from elsewhere, even if they are taken word for word, does not require {{WPAttribution}}, because references are simple "lists of facts".

Images also do not require {{WPAttribution}}, because their specific licensing terms are on the image's description page... Licensing , in this particular case. George Swan (talk) 17:19, 16 April 2024 (CDT)

Linkectomy

User:Pat Palmer, do you know a reason for this delinking of Pakistan? George Swan (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2024 (CDT)