Talk:Global warming
Workgroup category or categories | Earth Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Nereo Preto 08:23, 26 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This article talk page is now under dispute watch
See CZ:Dispute Watch. You're going to have to start using the {{prop}} template in the way that page describes, illustrated here: Talk:Oriental (word). We're testing out a dispute resolution idea, but I'm taking the test seriously. From now on, disputation on this page must be on-topic, and on-topic means (1) aimed at a specific proposition, (2) the proposition must concern the wording of the text, and (3) engaging in a dispute, as opposed to how to characterize the dispute, is off-topic. Call it the Anti-Bloviation Rule! :-)
Note, for this topic in particular, that how much dispute there is about this topic is itself (pretty obviously) a matter of dispute. So we must not take a stand on that dispute, but must describe it. --Larry Sanger 07:17, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- So we must suggest a different and specific change in the article's text to dispute the content herein? Benjamin Seghers 09:20, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
Yep. But notice that the change can be: delete it. --Larry Sanger 09:22, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
Global warming and hurricanes
- Proposition: I think we should expand on the role of global warming on hurricanes. I think this one area of higher amount of debate in the scientific community, with regards to how large an impact sea surface temperatures are having on intensity and frequency of hurricanes across the globe (as opposed to more natural factors, such as wind shear, for example). I don't know exactly what should be written, but there is much to say about the issue. Benjamin Seghers 12:43, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- This article is on dispute watch. This requires that all argumentation directly concern clearly-stated propositions about article wording.
Benjamin, please use {{prop}} if you want to make an argument--please rewrite the above (and then feel free to delete this) so that it is in conformity with CZ:Dispute Watch. Thanks. --Larry Sanger 12:33, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- I'm not really disputing anything, but if you say so. Benjamin Seghers 14:07, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- Earth Sciences Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Advanced Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Earth Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Earth Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Earth Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Earth Sciences External Articles
- Earth Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Earth Sciences Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup
- Dispute Watch