Talk:Ancient Celtic music/Draft
Russell Potter has nominated the version dated 22:11, 4 May 2007 of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Music Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on June 12 2007. |
Workgroup category or categories | Archaeology Workgroup, Classics Workgroup, Music Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 20:53, 13 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Article almost finished
Things still to do:
- include web links to translated or original sources in the footnotes
- still waiting for possible license permission to use images of the carnyx and other instruments
—Arne Eickenberg 14:41, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
- Whenever someone gets a moment, the by permission links in the image boxes should be made as internal links in the form [[Image_talk:Carnyx_AncientCelticCarnyces.jpg/Permission]]. Fabulous work here, by the way. :-) Stephen Ewen 02:57, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
Approval?
I wonder if this is getting close to approval, in your opinion. If so, please consult with Nancy Sculerati about finding someone to do the honors. From my entirely non-expert perspective, this is excellent work.
Also, can you please weigh in on the question who the relevant experts on this topic are? Classicists, musicologists, archaeologists--or all three? --Larry Sanger 11:58, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
- Hi Larry, thanks for your compliments. (^_^) Parts of the last paragraph on the "Romans as biased ethnographers" have to be revised. I'm currently looking through an article on the topic. As soon as the small note at the beginning of this paragraph is deleted, the article can be seen as ready for approval. A friend of mine (a music archaeologist) will look through the article when she has the time (probably in June). Another one, also an ethnologist afaik, has already read through the article, and I haven't heard anything yet. So either the article is good or it's complete cr*p. (^_~) In terms of internal CZ-experts: a) Classicists should double-check the sources and add links to online-texts, as it's being done in the Julius Caesar-article; b) musicologists and/or archaeologists (hopefully a music archaeologist) should go through the rest. So I guess there are still some things to do. —Arne Eickenberg 12:36, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
Well, as a contemporary US music critic, as well as someone with a lifelong amateur interest in Celtic music, culture, and history, I think I can help guide this through Approval -- we do have some classicists here, who could be of help, so I'm going to go ahead and nominate it! Russell Potter 20:29, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
hard time reading this line
This article is about the music and instruments of the ancient Celts until late Antiquity. For the modern folkloristic genre and its history see Celtic music.
I physically cannot read this line on my 15" Macbook Pro with Firefox on default settings. I have to get about a foot away from the screen to read it. Anyone else have that problem? Tom Kelly 22:25, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
- I increased the font size but I still do not like the result. Now it looks awkward compared to the rest of the article. Does anyone have a better idea? Tom Kelly 22:28, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
- Tom, I think fontsize 2 looks fine! Have a fresh look at it in the morning, and see what you think! Slainte, Russell Potter 22:40, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
I don't know the absolute size of the font you are looking at- but have you had your vision checked lately? You may be a tad far sighted. The font is only one size down and it looks fine to me, too. Same Mac-but safari, also default. Check your vision and see. Nancy Sculerati 01:27, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- For me it is small, but I can read it. It is italics. Maybe your browser doesn't have the font installed so it substitutes something that the rest of us don't see. Unfortunately I have no idea what to do about that. Maybe if we took out the italics? --Matt Innis (Talk) 07:43, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
Illustrations
I think the text of this article is ready for Approval -- but I was wondering if we might possibly have one or two additional illustrations. In particular, the Crwth; it's described as "a six-stringed wooden lyre with hollow ledger arms and wooden vortices in the ledger rod", but I wasn't at al sure what "ledger arms" or "vortices" were until I came upon this illustration:
It's from the Project Gutenberg edition of A Popular History of the Art of Music, by W. S. B. Mathews, which has a few other images perhaps of use. Russell Potter 09:06, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
- Music to Approve
- Articles to Approve
- Archaeology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Classics Category Check
- Music Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Archaeology Advanced Articles
- Archaeology Nonstub Articles
- Archaeology Internal Articles
- Classics Advanced Articles
- Classics Nonstub Articles
- Classics Internal Articles
- Music Advanced Articles
- Music Nonstub Articles
- Music Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Archaeology Developed Articles
- Classics Developed Articles
- Music Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Archaeology Developing Articles
- Classics Developing Articles
- Music Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Archaeology Stub Articles
- Classics Stub Articles
- Music Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Archaeology External Articles
- Classics External Articles
- Music External Articles
- Archaeology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Classics Underlinked Articles
- Music Underlinked Articles
- Archaeology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Classics Cleanup
- Music Cleanup