Talk:Telephone newspaper/Draft

Article Checklist for "Telephone newspaper/Draft"

Workgroup category or categories	Engineering Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status	Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article?	Yes
Basic cleanup done?	Yes
Checklist last edited by	Bruce M.Tindall

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---

Approval Area

Russell Potter has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Media Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on May 11, 2007.

This article is being nominated by an editor using the Individual Editor approval method. --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:10, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Just a note to reiterate my approval vote for this article, and ask that the most current version be moved to the approved page when the draft page is created. Many thanks, Russell Potter 14:54, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

Approval?

Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of CZ:Approval_Process, however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with [{ToApprove}} --Eric M Gearhart 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --Eric M Gearhart 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! Russell Potter 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at telephone newspaper (lower case)? It's not a proper name, is it? --Larry Sanger 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Since the wiki capitalizes everything (or, I should say, handles things the same either way), I'd prefer to have this article stay as it is. Russell Potter 13:26, 12 May 2007 (CDT)