User:David Hoffman: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "CZ:Article Mechanics" to "CZ:Article mechanics") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "CZ:How to get started as an author" to "CZ:The Author Role") |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*[[CZ:Policy Outline]] | *[[CZ:Policy Outline]] | ||
*[[CZ:Neutrality_Policy]] | *[[CZ:Neutrality_Policy]] | ||
*[[CZ: | *[[CZ:The Author Role]] | ||
*[[CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians]] | *[[CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians]] | ||
*[[CZ:Article mechanics]] | *[[CZ:Article mechanics]] | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
====Invite collaboration==== | ====Invite collaboration==== | ||
I love the idea of working collaboratively with people on a compendium of knowledge. Citizendium is appealling because we hope to raise the bar, compared to Wikipedia, by encouraging scholars to become involved. I like the idea of workgroups and an editorial process. Still, there won't be much collaboration without a critical mass of people who join CZ and feel welcomed to change and contribute to articles. I've read and endorse the Statement of Fundamental Principles. I've also read the piece for [[CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians|Wikipedia writers]] as well as the blog post on un-forking Wikipedia. In my view, it makes sense to try to [[CZ: | I love the idea of working collaboratively with people on a compendium of knowledge. Citizendium is appealling because we hope to raise the bar, compared to Wikipedia, by encouraging scholars to become involved. I like the idea of workgroups and an editorial process. Still, there won't be much collaboration without a critical mass of people who join CZ and feel welcomed to change and contribute to articles. I've read and endorse the Statement of Fundamental Principles. I've also read the piece for [[CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians|Wikipedia writers]] as well as the blog post on un-forking Wikipedia. In my view, it makes sense to try to [[CZ:The Author Role#Under Construction, or, it's better to add something editable than nothing at all |add something]], add a fair amount, to give both current members and visitors enough material to spark their interest and give them places to contribute, even where they aren't experts. | ||
====On stubs and imported Wikipedia articles==== | ====On stubs and imported Wikipedia articles==== | ||
Latest revision as of 10:58, 7 March 2024
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
I live in a lovely neighborhood less than a mile from a topnotch research library, where I spend much of my time. I hold a graduate degree for pursuing my academic interests in public policy, religion, and ethics. I also enjoy reading, teaching, technology, basketball and various outdoor sports. Though based in the U.S., I've had the pleasure of traveling and living in quite different cultural settings.
You are welcome to reach me through my talk page or send me an email.
Current efforts
- Jews and Judaism, discuss
- Sephardi Jews, discuss
- Ashkenazi Jews
- Orthodox Judaism, discuss
- Conservative Judaism, discuss
- Reform Judaism
- Karaites, discuss
- Editing
- Hebrew Bible, discuss
Top 10 wish list in random order: Jewish history, Jewish law (halakhah), Holocaust, Israel (currently a stub), Torah, Sabbath and Holy days (Judaism), Rabbinic literature, Modern Jewish thought, Rashi, Maimonides
Bookmarks
Your suggestions welcome here....
- CZ:Policy Outline
- CZ:Neutrality_Policy
- CZ:The Author Role
- CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians
- CZ:Article mechanics
- CZ:Personnel
- CZ:How to edit an article with wiki markup
- Law -- needs revised narrative, edit religious law
My strategy as a CZ contributor
Here are my initial thoughts, which I will revise as I become more experienced here. Please feel free to comment on this statement on my talk page. (You may also edit my wording here!)
Invite collaboration
I love the idea of working collaboratively with people on a compendium of knowledge. Citizendium is appealling because we hope to raise the bar, compared to Wikipedia, by encouraging scholars to become involved. I like the idea of workgroups and an editorial process. Still, there won't be much collaboration without a critical mass of people who join CZ and feel welcomed to change and contribute to articles. I've read and endorse the Statement of Fundamental Principles. I've also read the piece for Wikipedia writers as well as the blog post on un-forking Wikipedia. In my view, it makes sense to try to add something, add a fair amount, to give both current members and visitors enough material to spark their interest and give them places to contribute, even where they aren't experts.
On stubs and imported Wikipedia articles
For this reason, I am inclined to bring in stubs and reasonably good articles from Wikipedia. Such stubs and articles, I think, invite participation and at least give some basic info to enrich the core articles. (My view here goes against the preferred CZ approach). Also, I would think that enough stubs and developing articles would increase readership, within CZ, from Wikipedia or from the Internet overall.
Accordingly, my strategy is to bring in a core set of Wikipedia articlea used to describe Judaism and give them a quick, rough CZ revision. These would include the major movements, the Jews, some key figures, and some key practices, provided that these do not look problematic. I will tend to avoid bringing in beliefs, history, etc., which tend to be more problematic.
Helpful items
[[Category:Religion Workgroup]]