Talk:Whig Party: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sandy Harris (→A suggestion: good one, need disambig) |
imported>Peter Jackson |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: Yes, "whig" or "whig party" should be a disambiguation page. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 14:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | : Yes, "whig" or "whig party" should be a disambiguation page. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 14:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, treating a fairly short-lived American party as the primary reference, rather than the much longer-lived British one (or the modern Liberian one) seems very Americocentric). [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 11:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:24, 14 December 2019
A suggestion
Perhaps this article should begin by mentioning which country it is referring to?—Nat Krause 09:37, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
Yes, there were whigs in the U.K., of course. "Whig Party" should be a disambiguation page, with the current article living at Whig Party (United States) or U.S. Whig Party perhaps. --Larry Sanger 00:25, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, "whig" or "whig party" should be a disambiguation page. Sandy Harris 14:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, treating a fairly short-lived American party as the primary reference, rather than the much longer-lived British one (or the modern Liberian one) seems very Americocentric). Peter Jackson (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developed Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History tag