Talk:Tux/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
imported>Stephen Ewen
Line 45: Line 45:
::<S>Alright, I am pretty much done with what will be any of my major additions.</S> I am satisfied that this has gone a long way from [[CZ:CZ4WP#Get_ready_to_rethink_how_to_write_encyclopedia_articles.21|"encyclopedese"]] to, as David described, "a great little story". [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 23:32, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
::<S>Alright, I am pretty much done with what will be any of my major additions.</S> I am satisfied that this has gone a long way from [[CZ:CZ4WP#Get_ready_to_rethink_how_to_write_encyclopedia_articles.21|"encyclopedese"]] to, as David described, "a great little story". [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 23:32, 13 April 2007 (CDT)


==Pre-approval nominnation issues==
==Pre-approval issues==
* '''Ref #1, Matt Hartley (1996-05-5). Linux logo.''' - this points to nothing indicated in the text.
* '''Ref #1, Matt Hartley (1996-05-5). Linux logo.''' - this points to nothing indicated in the text.
* '''Sourcing''' - Each statement should be sourced. This is because I doubt we have a Computer Workgroup editor on-board who is completely versed in the "history of Tux"! We need to provide confidence, therefore, by providing for full ease of fact-checking.
* '''Sourcing''' - Each statement should be sourced. This is because I doubt we have a Computer Workgroup editor on-board who is completely versed in the "history of Tux"! We need to provide confidence, therefore, by providing for full ease of fact-checking.

Revision as of 12:19, 14 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Tux/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Greg Woodhouse 19:00, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Toapprove.png
Robert Tito has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Computers Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on 4-21-2007.


Tux talk archives
Archive 1, 4-11-07: Talk:Tux/Archive1
Archive 2, 4-13-07: Talk:Tux/Archive2

Suggestion

Please see CZ:Topic Informant Workgroup: it seems to me that this is a perfect opportunity for us to do some interviews of some of the people involved, and/or to have them look at the article and suggest corrections and expansions. Let me know if you're interested. --Larry Sanger 15:47, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

I'm interested. I'll try to track down a current e-mail for each of the guys mentioned in the article. --Joshua David Williams 18:50, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

New version

Thanks to Thomas, I believe the toapprove tag can now be updated. He did a wonderful job! --Joshua David Williams 18:09, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Why a Linux mascot?

I remember reading in some Usenet post by Linus that he liked the concept of a mascot because more can be done with it than a static logo. He mentioned that the Windows logo is nice, but there's not a lot that can be done with it. So I think the last paragraph needs to be changed slightly after I track down that message. --Joshua David Williams 19:41, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Non- Computer group reaction

For the general reader this is shaping up a a great little story. David Tribe 19:52, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

I agree. Stephen has contributed quite and Thomas have contributed quite a bit to the flow and readability of this article. If you like this one, you should check out the BSD Daemon article as well. I've been writing back and forth with the copyright holder asking questions about it. When it's done, it may be the most complete history of that mascot that's ever been compiled. --Joshua David Williams 21:22, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
Alright, I am pretty much done with what will be any of my major additions. I am satisfied that this has gone a long way from "encyclopedese" to, as David described, "a great little story". Stephen Ewen 23:32, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Pre-approval issues

  • Ref #1, Matt Hartley (1996-05-5). Linux logo. - this points to nothing indicated in the text.
  • Sourcing - Each statement should be sourced. This is because I doubt we have a Computer Workgroup editor on-board who is completely versed in the "history of Tux"! We need to provide confidence, therefore, by providing for full ease of fact-checking.
  • Continued "distributions" of Tux section - we need a small image gallery of some of the best interpretations of Tux.

Stephen Ewen 01:22, 14 April 2007 (CDT)