User:Robert W King: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King (→Status) |
imported>Robert W King (I AM ON BREAK.) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
({{Usertime-text|Robert}}{{Template:Utc|-5}}) | ({{Usertime-text|Robert}}{{Template:Utc|-5}}) | ||
I am currently on | <BIG>'''I am currently on break.'''</big> Please feel free to leave a message on my '''[[User_talk:Robert_W_King|talk page]]''' | ||
--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:29, 11 February 2008 (CST) | --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:29, 11 February 2008 (CST) | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* [[User:ContribBot|ContribBot]] is delayed, possibly indefinately. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a message at my [[User_Talk:Robert_W_King|talk page]]. | * [[User:ContribBot|ContribBot]] is delayed, possibly indefinately. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a message at my [[User_Talk:Robert_W_King|talk page]]. | ||
* I am currently a Cruft-Fighting Extraordinaire. | * I am currently a Cruft-Fighting Extraordinaire. | ||
--> | |||
==About me== | ==About me== | ||
Line 58: | Line 60: | ||
*The World is Flat 3.0 - | *The World is Flat 3.0 - | ||
*Supercapitalism - | *Supercapitalism - | ||
<!-- 09:39, 14 April 2007 --> | <!-- 09:39, 14 April 2007 --> | ||
===Quick Links=== | ===Quick Links=== | ||
*http://yarchive.net/home.html | *http://yarchive.net/home.html | ||
Line 72: | Line 74: | ||
| | | | ||
{{Col-begin}} | {{Col-begin}} | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<!-- BEGIN DASHBOARD --> | <!-- BEGIN DASHBOARD --> | ||
{{Col-break|width=33%}} | {{Col-break|width=33%}} | ||
Line 293: | Line 290: | ||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Schedule Executive Schedule] | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Schedule Executive Schedule] | ||
==Philosophies== | ==Philosophies== |
Revision as of 10:22, 11 February 2008
Status
( Where Robert lives it is approximately: 00:51)
I am currently on break. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page
--Robert W King 09:29, 11 February 2008 (CST)
About me
I am a young man working in the field of Information Assurance, and living somewhere in Northern Virginia. I hold an Associate's in Information Technology from NVCC and am working (infrequently) on my B.S. in Information Technology from George Mason University. My interests include data organization, networks, philosophy, critical thinking, and observation.
In the past I have contributed to U.S. Government articles within Wikipedia, and reported on the Wired-sponsored Assignment Zero. (Profile here, contributions here)
I would eventually like to pursue a career in global policy.
Books I have read or am currently reading:
- The Fountainhead - Ayn Rand (cmplt.)
- Status Anxiety - Alain De Botton (cmplt.)
- The Use and Abuse of Art - Jacques Barzun (un-r)
- The Tipping Point - Malcolm Gladwell (mostly-r)
- Talk to the Hand - Lynne Truss (cmplt.)
- Stiff - Mary Roach (cmplt.)
- The World is Flat 3.0 -
- Supercapitalism -
Quick Links
Tabella Nemorosus | ||||
|
I performed levels of relentless editing on these articles:
I created the following images:
|
List of Wikipedia articles I have authored and/or contributed to:
- OMB Circular A-21
- OMB Circular A-16
- OMB Circular A-130
- OMB Circular A-126
- OMB Circular A-123
- Hatch Act of 1939
- Geographic Information System
- General Services Administration
- Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949
- Executive Schedule
Philosophies
Neutrality
There are three properties that I believe should be adhered to in the context of this project when it comes to non-philosophical topics: fact, relevancy, and neutrality.
- Fact: Everything that pertains to a particular subject should not be made up or speculated on. There should be no lies and no conjecture. I believe in trails, audits, and observations. That which is shown to be absolutely provable.
- Relevancy: There will always be a percentage of information which points to a demonstratable conclusion. Only the upmost definitive evidence that shows A leads to B should be included.
- Neutrality: Every viewpoint should be shown, and substantiated with credible sources. Credibile does not mean "existing", "popular", or "notable"; but rather those sources that are known to exhibit only the observable and objective truth and not an agenda or bias. Documentation is a must.
It is the reponsibility for everyone who wishes to further the knowledge and education of the masses to provide the basis for others to make their own decisions. One should be "informative" and not "convincing" when it comes to the essential elements of knowledge.