Talk:Personal computer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>ZachPruckowski No edit summary |
imported>ZachPruckowski No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I reorganized the article because I feel as though the primary interest here will be in the computer itself (uses, configuration, etc.), as opposed to the history. As such, coverage of the history can be moved a bit further back. Of course, that's open to discussion --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 14:28, 16 January 2007 (CST) | I reorganized the article because I feel as though the primary interest here will be in the computer itself (uses, configuration, etc.), as opposed to the history. As such, coverage of the history can be moved a bit further back. Of course, that's open to discussion --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 14:28, 16 January 2007 (CST) | ||
==Plans for article? Anyone?== | |||
The History section needs a good bit of clean-up. I'm not really qualified to do that. | |||
Also, we need to work out the deal with the non-IBM-compatible PCs. I think we want to say something, obviously, but I'm not sold on a huge list like that. --[[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 15:01, 18 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 16:01, 18 January 2007
I reorganized the article because I feel as though the primary interest here will be in the computer itself (uses, configuration, etc.), as opposed to the history. As such, coverage of the history can be moved a bit further back. Of course, that's open to discussion --ZachPruckowski 14:28, 16 January 2007 (CST)
Plans for article? Anyone?
The History section needs a good bit of clean-up. I'm not really qualified to do that. Also, we need to work out the deal with the non-IBM-compatible PCs. I think we want to say something, obviously, but I'm not sold on a huge list like that. --ZachPruckowski 15:01, 18 January 2007 (CST)