Talk:Embryology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Embryology | |||
| cat1 = Biology | |||
| cat2 = Health Sciences | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = y | |||
| status = 2 | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:38, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST) | Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Cut from article: {{Embryology}} | Cut from article: {{Embryology}} |
Revision as of 09:38, 17 March 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup, Health Sciences Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Larry Sanger 10:38, 17 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.DavidGoodman 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST)
Cut from article: Template:Embryology
Categories:
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Health Sciences External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Health Sciences Cleanup
- Cleanup