Brown v. Board of Education: Difference between revisions
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref> and a model for many future [[impact litigation]] cases.<ref name="Schuck">{{cite book |last=Schuck |first=P.H. |title=Meditations of a Militant Moderate: Cool Views on Hot Topics |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] |series=G – Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-7425-3961-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EjD7gt8kvw8C&pg=PA104 |page=104}}</ref> | |access-date=2023-02-23}}</ref> and a model for many future [[impact litigation]] cases.<ref name="Schuck">{{cite book |last=Schuck |first=P.H. |title=Meditations of a Militant Moderate: Cool Views on Hot Topics |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] |series=G – Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-7425-3961-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EjD7gt8kvw8C&pg=PA104 |page=104}}</ref> | ||
The case originated in 1951 when the public school system in [[Topeka, Kansas]], refused to enroll local [[African Americans|black]] resident [[Oliver Brown (American activist)|Oliver Brown]]'s daughter at the elementary school closest to their home, instead requiring her to ride a bus to a segregated black school farther away. The Browns and twelve other local black families in similar situations filed a [[class action|class-action]] lawsuit in U.S. federal court against the Topeka Board of Education, alleging that its segregation policy was unconstitutional. A special three-judge court of the [[United States District Court for the District of Kansas|U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas]] rendered a verdict against the Browns, relying on the precedent of ''Plessy'' and its "separate but equal" doctrine. The Browns, represented by [[NAACP]] chief counsel [[Thurgood Marshall]], then appealed the ruling directly to the Supreme Court. | The case, commonly referred to as ''Brown v. Board of Education'', originated in 1951 when the public school system in [[Topeka, Kansas]], refused to enroll local [[African Americans|black]] resident [[Oliver Brown (American activist)|Oliver Brown]]'s daughter at the elementary school closest to their home, instead requiring her to ride a bus to a segregated black school farther away. The Browns and twelve other local black families in similar situations filed a [[class action|class-action]] lawsuit in U.S. federal court against the Topeka Board of Education, alleging that its segregation policy was unconstitutional. A special three-judge court of the [[United States District Court for the District of Kansas|U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas]] rendered a verdict against the Browns, relying on the precedent of ''Plessy'' and its "separate but equal" doctrine. The Browns, represented by [[NAACP]] chief counsel [[Thurgood Marshall]], then appealed the ruling directly to the Supreme Court. | ||
In May 1954, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9–0 decision in favor of the Browns. The Court ruled that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," and therefore laws that impose them violate the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] of the [[United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution]]. However, the decision's 14 pages did not spell out any sort of method for ending racial segregation in schools, and the Court's second decision in ''[[#Brown II|Brown II]]'' ({{ussc|349|294|1955}}) only ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed". | In May 1954, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9–0 decision in favor of the Browns. The Court ruled that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," and therefore laws that impose them violate the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] of the [[United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution]]. However, the decision's 14 pages did not spell out any sort of method for ending racial segregation in schools, and the Court's second decision in ''[[#Brown II|Brown II]]'' ({{ussc|349|294|1955}}) only ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed". | ||
Revision as of 11:33, 10 September 2023
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in publicly-funded schools are unconstitutional even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision partially overruled the Court's 1896 decision Plessy v. Ferguson, which had held that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that had come to be known as "separate but equal".Template:Notetag The Court's decision in Brown paved the way for integration and was a major victory of the civil rights movement,[1] and a model for many future impact litigation cases.[2]
The case, commonly referred to as Brown v. Board of Education, originated in 1951 when the public school system in Topeka, Kansas, refused to enroll local black resident Oliver Brown's daughter at the elementary school closest to their home, instead requiring her to ride a bus to a segregated black school farther away. The Browns and twelve other local black families in similar situations filed a class-action lawsuit in U.S. federal court against the Topeka Board of Education, alleging that its segregation policy was unconstitutional. A special three-judge court of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas rendered a verdict against the Browns, relying on the precedent of Plessy and its "separate but equal" doctrine. The Browns, represented by NAACP chief counsel Thurgood Marshall, then appealed the ruling directly to the Supreme Court.
In May 1954, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9–0 decision in favor of the Browns. The Court ruled that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," and therefore laws that impose them violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, the decision's 14 pages did not spell out any sort of method for ending racial segregation in schools, and the Court's second decision in Brown II () only ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed".
In the Southern United States, especially the "Deep South", where racial segregation was deeply entrenched, the reaction to Brown among most white people was "noisy and stubborn".Template:Sfnp Many Southern governmental and political leaders embraced a plan known as "massive resistance", created by Senator Harry F. Byrd, in order to frustrate attempts to force them to de-segregate their school systems. Four years later, in the case of Cooper v. Aaron, the Court reaffirmed its ruling in Brown, and explicitly stated that state officials and legislators had no power to nullify its ruling.
Provenance
- Some content on this page may previously have appeared on Wikipedia.
Notes
- ↑ Hartford, Bruce. Brown v. Board of Education Decision (May).
- ↑ Schuck, P.H. (2006). Meditations of a Militant Moderate: Cool Views on Hot Topics. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-3961-7.