Likelihood ratio: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Richard D. Gill
(link odds ~~~~)
Line 9: Line 9:
:<math>\text{Post-test odds} = \text{Pre-test odds} * \text{Likelihood}\ \text{ratio}</math>
:<math>\text{Post-test odds} = \text{Pre-test odds} * \text{Likelihood}\ \text{ratio}</math>


Comparing likelihoods (or odds) is different than comparing percentages. (or probabilities).
Comparing likelihoods (or [[odds]]) is different than comparing percentages. (or probabilities).


:<math>\text{Odds}=\frac{\text{probability}}{(1-\text{probability})}</math>  
:<math>\text{Odds}=\frac{\text{probability}}{(1-\text{probability})}</math>  

Revision as of 11:18, 26 January 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In diagnostic tests, the likelihood ratio is the likelihood that a clinical sign is in a patient with disease as compared to a patient without disease.

To calculate probabilities of disease using a likelihood ratio:

Comparing likelihoods (or odds) is different than comparing percentages. (or probabilities).

The likelihood ratio is an alternative to sensitivity and specificity for the numeric interpretation of diagnostic tests. In a randomized controlled trial that compared the two methods, physicians were able to use both similarly although the physicians had trouble with both methods.[1]

Calculations

Likelihood ratios are related to sensitivity and specificity.

The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) measures the likelihood of a finding being present in patient with the disease. A large LR+, for example a value more than 10, helps rule in disease.[2]

The negative likelihood ratio (LR-) measures the likelihood of a finding being absent in patient with the disease. A small LR-, for example a value less than 0.1, helps rule out disease.[2]

References

  1. Puhan MA, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, ter Riet G (August 2005). "A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates". Ann. Intern. Med. 143 (3): 184–9. PMID 16061916[e]
  2. 2.0 2.1 McGee S (August 2002). "Simplifying likelihood ratios". J Gen Intern Med 17 (8): 646–9. PMID 12213147[e]