Urinary catheterization: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett |
imported>Robert Badgett |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Urinary tract infection=== | ===Urinary tract infection=== | ||
Regarding short-term catheterization: | Regarding short-term catheterization: | ||
* | * Antiseptic impregnated catheters reduce [[urinary tract infection]]s according to a systematic review by the [[Cochrane Collaboration]].<ref name="pmid18951451">{{cite journal |author=Schumm K, Lam TB |title=Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review |journal=Neurourology and urodynamics |volume=27 |issue=8 |pages=738–46; discussion 747–8 |year=2008 |pmid=18951451 |doi=10.1002/nau.20645 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.20645 |issn=}}</ref> | ||
* " | * "Condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia" according to a randomized controlled trial.<ref name="pmid16866675">{{cite journal |author=Saint S, Kaufman SR, Rogers MA, Baker PD, Ossenkop K, Lipsky BA |title=Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial |journal=Journal of the American Geriatrics Society |volume=54 |issue=7 |pages=1055–61 |year=2006 |month=July |pmid=16866675 |doi=10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00785.x |url=http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=0002-8614&date=2006&volume=54&issue=7&spage=1055 |issn=}}</ref> | ||
* Suprapubic catheters "have advantages over indwelling catheters in respect of bacteriuria, recatheterisation and discomfort."<ref name="pmid16034924">{{cite journal |author=Niël-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ |title=Urinary catheter policies for short-term bladder drainage in adults |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=3 |pages=CD004203 |year=2005 |pmid=16034924 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD004203.pub2 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004203.pub2 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
Regarding long-term catheterization and prevention of [[urinary tract infection]]s: | Regarding long-term catheterization and prevention of [[urinary tract infection]]s: | ||
Revision as of 08:10, 17 February 2009
In medicine, urinary catheterization is "employment or passage of a catheter into the urinary bladder (urethral catheterization) or kidney (ureteral catheterization) for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes.[1]
Complications
Urinary tract infection
Regarding short-term catheterization:
- Antiseptic impregnated catheters reduce urinary tract infections according to a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[2]
- "Condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia" according to a randomized controlled trial.[3]
- Suprapubic catheters "have advantages over indwelling catheters in respect of bacteriuria, recatheterisation and discomfort."[4]
Regarding long-term catheterization and prevention of urinary tract infections:
- It is not clear what type of catheterization is best according to at systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[5]
- It is not clear what methods of intermittent catheterization are best according to at systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[6]
Removal of urinary catheters
Retained volumes of more than 900 ml reduced chance of successful removal of the catheter.[7]
Regarding how long to wait until a voiding without catheter trial, "a tendency for later removal to be associated with fewer short-term voiding problems, but increasing risk of urinary tract infection, more dissatisfaction and longer hospital stay" according to a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[8]
Removing the catheter at midnight might be the most effective determinant according to a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[8]
Alfuzosin SR 5mg did not help.[9] Intermittent clamping of catheters is of uncertain benefit.[10]
References
- ↑ Anonymous (2024), Urinary catheterization (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
- ↑ Schumm K, Lam TB (2008). "Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review". Neurourology and urodynamics 27 (8): 738–46; discussion 747–8. DOI:10.1002/nau.20645. PMID 18951451. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Saint S, Kaufman SR, Rogers MA, Baker PD, Ossenkop K, Lipsky BA (July 2006). "Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial". Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 54 (7): 1055–61. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00785.x. PMID 16866675. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Niël-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ (2005). "Urinary catheter policies for short-term bladder drainage in adults". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD004203. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004203.pub2. PMID 16034924. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Jahn P, Preuss M, Kernig A, Seifert-Hühmer A, Langer G (2007). "Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (3): CD004997. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004997.pub2. PMID 17636782. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Moore KN, Fader M, Getliffe K (2007). "Long-term bladder management by intermittent catheterisation in adults and children". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (4): CD006008. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub2. PMID 17943874. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Taube M, Gajraj H (February 1989). "Trial without catheter following acute retention of urine". Br J Urol 63 (2): 180–2. PMID 2641206. [e]
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Griffiths R, Fernandez R (2007). "Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD004011. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3. PMID 17443536. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Shah T, Palit V, Biyani S, Elmasry Y, Puri R, Flannigan GM (October 2002). "Randomised, placebo controlled, double blind study of alfuzosin SR in patients undergoing trial without catheter following acute urinary retention". Eur. Urol. 42 (4): 329–32; discussion 332. PMID 12361896. [e]
- ↑ Fernandez RS, Griffiths RD (2005). "Clamping short-term indwelling catheters: a systematic review of the evidence". J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 32 (5): 329–36. PMID 16234728. [e]