History of England: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
===Civil War (1642 - 48)=== | ===Civil War (1642 - 48)=== | ||
The English civil war was the outcome of a long standing conflict between those that | The English civil war was the outcome of a long standing conflict between those who held that the recently established Parliament should, if necessary, exert control over the King#s rule, and those who held that the King should be the sole ruler, unfettered by parliament. The King drew his support mainly from those of [[Anglican]] and [[Catholic]] backgrounds and also from the nobility. Many of those in support of the Parliament were from [[Puritan]] backgrounds who suspected that the King intended to return England to Catholicism. Geographically, the King drew much of support from the landowners of Northern and Western England, and the parliamentary army had the support of the merchants of London and the South-East. In early 1644 the Scottish army entered north England and with the parliamentary army dealt a series of crushing defeats, particularly at [[Battle of Marston Moor|Marston Moor]] in July 1644 and [[Battle of Naseby|Naseby]] in June 1645, as they moved south. In June 1646 Oxford surrendered and in 1647 the King surrendered to the Scots and was handed over to the Parliament who imprisoned him. However the King escaped and fled to Scotland. He persuaded the Scottish army to fight for him, but it was defeated at Preston in August 1648. Charles was imprisoned again, beheaded on January 30<sup>th</sup>, 1649, and the republic known as the Commonwealth was set up, governed by Parliament and by an executive council of state. | ||
===Commonwealth (1649-54)=== | ===Commonwealth (1649-54)=== |
Revision as of 15:40, 29 July 2009
The History of Britain covers the history of Great Britain and Ireland (before the creation of an independent Eire) from prehistoric times to the present.
Introduction
The main body of this article traces some of the developments that influenced the evolution of the British constitution. It does so mainly by reviewing the broad outcomes of sequences of events, often without giving any attention to individual events. The timelines subpage takes a different approach by listing those events that are conventionally considered most influential. Readers who want to examine individual events in more detail are invited to make use of the links on that subpage.
Overview
British law is like no other (except, of course the laws of those countries that Britain once administered.)
Prehistory
The oldest human remains that have been found in Britain have been carbon-dated as being up to 10,000 years old, and the DNA of a skeleton found in a Cheddar cave has been found to be a close match of a modern dweller in the same area[1]. Since the separation of Britain from the continental landmass did not occur until about 6000 BCE [2], it would be wrong to refer to "Cheddar Man" as British, but the survival of his DNA, despite the subsequent intrusions of conquerors and migrants has been cited in defence of the relevance of ancient history to current affairs.
The main evidence of prehistoric communal activity concerns the "Beaker People" of the 2nd and 3rd centuries BCE - named after their distinctive ware pottery. The Beaker People kept livestock and cultivated flax and cereals, used woven fabrics and practiced archery. The wide diffusion of the pottery discoveries suggests that they were a mobile and energetic people, and their grave goods indicate fairly extensive trading activities.[3]. However, the scores of megaliths that are to be found scattered throughout Britain and Ireland provide the most visible evidence of the achievements of that period. The evidence of Stonehenge[4] suggests that some of the inhabitants were accomplished civil engineers, and that some had acquired some knowledge of astronomy. The technology that they used is not known - although Bernard Cornwell has provided a plausible fictional account of how they might have solved the problem[5],
The Celts (c600 BCE - 49 CE)
The history of Celtic people in Britain is limited by a lack of textual evidence about the period, but it is clear from the archeological evidence [6] that they, too were far from primitive. "Ogham inscriptions" on surviving stone artifacts [7] prove that they used an alphabetic language that modern linguists have been able to decipher, and historians tend to conclude that a Celtic aversion to textual recording must have been the reason for the lack of other textual evidence. The Celts are known to have been migrants from Northern Europe because of their common cultural characteristics, including related languages and similar artifacts[8]. They were all users of metal ploughs and various forms of wheeled transport [9]. Despite the existence of those common cultural characteristics, there is no evidence to suggest that there was any coordination of their activities, or that any Celt thought of himself as a member of any organisation larger than his own tribe [10]. However, the two dozen or so tribes that settled in Britain and Ireland have been categorised into two linguistic groupings - the "Goidelic" group including Irish, Manx and Scottish; and the "Brythonic" group including Breton, Welsh and Cornish - or, more precisely, those were the languages into which they gradually evolved. All of those languages have survived of have been revived, and they constitute one category of the modern legacy from the Celtic migration. (The various modern "Celtic Revival" organisations also lay claim to a range of cultural legacies, some of which, such as "Celtic Music" consist of developments occurring long after Celtic Britain gave way to Roman Britain).
The Romans (49-410 CE)
The period of over a thousand years of Celtic domination was succeeded in parts of Britain by a very different period of about four hundred years of Roman occupation. Whereas the people known collectively as Celts consisted of a large number of independent or loosely-associated tribes that occasionally coalesced into somewhat larger groupings, the Romans who invaded Britain were a closely coordinated, centrally-managed occupation force. Whereas the Celtic contribution had been largely genetic and cultural, the Roman contribution was largely technological and political. Although the culture of Rome and ancient Greece was to have a profound influence upon British culture, that did not happen as a result of the Roman occupation. Its major contributions at the time were the result of the occupiers' skills in political administration and civil engineering. The inhabitants of those parts of Britain that came completely under Roman control gained the benefits of living in a province of the Roman empire. Those gains included the establishment and enforcement of a legal system, access to Greek and Roman culture, and the building in stone of villas, towns and roads. All freeborn Britons became Roman citizens, and there was eventually no meaningful distinction between being British and being Roman.
The practice of Christianity in the Roman Empire was a capital offence until the Edict of Milan in 313 CE, but the martyrdom of St Albans is evidence that it was nevertheless practiced in Britain. The recorded attendance of British bishops at the Council of Arles in 314 CE suggests the previous existence of a form of Christian church among the local population, and the adoption of Christianity as the Roman state religion in 391CE must have helped it to spread.
Where there was not complete Roman control, Celtic society survived and developed along different lines. The Romans did not invade Ireland, they abandoned their early attempts to control what is now Scotland, and they achieved only partial control of England north of the river Trent. In Ireland, in particular there was unbroken development, up to the eleventh century invasions of the Vikings and the Normans, and to some extent beyond those events. In Ireland and in Scotland there was a progressive transition from a fragmented tribal structure into larger groupings that were eventual to lead to integrated national political structures.
- ( more detailed accounts of developments in Ireland and Scotland are available in the articles Ireland, history and Scotland, history)
The Saxons (410-c800 CE)
After the sudden departure of the Romans, England lost nearly all traces of Roman culture. In the course of the following two centuries there was a major decline in the numbers able to read Latin, villas, towns and roads were - with only a few exceptions - allowed to decay, and all stone-working skills were lost. Military and politically control passed eventually to the relatively uncultured Saxons, who first came to England as hired mercenaries and later stayed as conquerors. Total conquest was not immediate, however, but was delayed by successful resistance under Ambrosius and Arthur, as a result of which a decaying form of Roman culture survived in parts of England for nearly two hundred years.
It is not known whether the British/Roman Christians attempted to convert the Saxon invaders after the end of the Roman occupation (the historian Bede[11] said that they did not, but his impartiality has been questioned [12].). However, it seems safe to assume that Christian churches survived in the regions of Wales and Cornwall that the invaders did not reach, although their existence may have been unknown to the church officials in Rome. The most significant development, however was the establishment of Christianity in Ireland, and the establishment of monasteries there, where they became centres of learning. Missionaries from the Irish monasteries later carried their religious beliefs and their learning to communities in Scotland and Northern England and played a part in the conversion of the English Saxons to Christianity. That process was completed by the mission of Saint Augustine from Rome and the adoption of the Vatican's doctrines by the Saxon Christians.
The Vikings (c800 - 1066)
There followed a period of about two hundred years during which the name "England" was first adopted, and England was first united under a single ruler. It was also a period during which substantial numbers of Scandinavian settlers were added to the mainly Saxon population, and during which Christianity eventually became the officially established religion. A major part in those transitions was played by the "Vikings" who were raiders from a variety of Scandinavian countries, and "Danes", who were settlers from a similar source who were supported by substantial military forces. At the beginning of the period, the invaders were bands of savage pagan marauders, and by its end - when they finally assumed control - they were civilised, mainly Christian, members of an established Scandinavian empire.
Among the Saxon natives, the dominant figure in the first half of the period was Alfred, King of Wessex. It was he who united the country's local leaders in combined resistance to the invaders, and who became England's first king. Alfred combined the qualities of scholar, educator, law-maker, administrator, military strategist and Christian leader. He gave England its first code of law[13], its first navy and its first well-organised army. His military successes enabled him to negotiate a partition of the country with the Danish leader, Guthrum, and to recapture London.
After Alfred's death, his successors continued to gain territory from the Danes but in 1890 they counter-attacked in force, reconquered South East England and eventually the whole country. The dominant figure during that period was Canute, who ruled over an empire that included England, Jutland, Norway, Iceland and Greenland. Danish reign over England ended with his death in 1041.
The Normans (1066 - 1133)
The Normans revolutionised the governance of England mainly by adapting and extending existing institutions. Voluntary agreements under which land tenure was awarded in return for an oath of service to a lord were developed by the Normans into a hierarchical system of compulsory military service [14], under which the majority of people became serfs, or "villeins", each obliged to serve a lord [15], who, in turn, was obliged to serve the King by paying taxes and occasionally helping to raise an army.
The Plantagenets(1133 - 1485)
The Tudors 1485-1605
The Stuarts : 1605-1688
Uniting the three kingdoms
Civil War (1642 - 48)
The English civil war was the outcome of a long standing conflict between those who held that the recently established Parliament should, if necessary, exert control over the King#s rule, and those who held that the King should be the sole ruler, unfettered by parliament. The King drew his support mainly from those of Anglican and Catholic backgrounds and also from the nobility. Many of those in support of the Parliament were from Puritan backgrounds who suspected that the King intended to return England to Catholicism. Geographically, the King drew much of support from the landowners of Northern and Western England, and the parliamentary army had the support of the merchants of London and the South-East. In early 1644 the Scottish army entered north England and with the parliamentary army dealt a series of crushing defeats, particularly at Marston Moor in July 1644 and Naseby in June 1645, as they moved south. In June 1646 Oxford surrendered and in 1647 the King surrendered to the Scots and was handed over to the Parliament who imprisoned him. However the King escaped and fled to Scotland. He persuaded the Scottish army to fight for him, but it was defeated at Preston in August 1648. Charles was imprisoned again, beheaded on January 30th, 1649, and the republic known as the Commonwealth was set up, governed by Parliament and by an executive council of state.
Commonwealth (1649-54)
Restoration(1654-88)
The Glorious Revolution
The British empire
The Industrial Revolution
Growth
The Industrial revolution began in mid-18th century and by the 1840s had dramatically changed the economy.
Reform (1)
First World War
The inter-war years
Reform (2)
Prime Minister David Lloyd George led a coalition of Liberals and conservatives into the 1918 election. His letter endorsing coalition candidates was referred to as a coupon by Herbert Asquith, hence the term coupon election. [16] This was the first election since 1910 and the first in which women had the vote. The major issues of the coalition programme where; a) to try the German Kaiser. b) To make Germany pay a large war indemnity. c) To create a country 'fit for heroes' who had returned from the war. [17]
These policies were popular and Georges's reputation as 'the man who won the war' ensured that the coalition won by a wide margin. The election results were notable for the Sinn Féin success in Ireland, the rise of Labour with 59 seats as the main opposition and the beginning of the disintegration of the once mighty Liberal Party, whose supporters flocked to both the Conservatives and Labour in years to come.
In the early years of the new government a number of measures were passed which added to George's reputation as a social reformer. The Fisher Education Act (1918) abolished child labour. The Housing Act (1919) led to over 200,000 houses being built and the Insurance Act (1921) extended insurance to all workers suffering from illness or those unemployed. However the government was beset by a number of problems which led to George's resignation.
Four million men demobilised by the end of 1921. As women were not allowed to retain the jobs they had worked in during the war and because of the subsequent economic boom, most men were absorbed into industry. Yet many of these veterans were restless and yearned for a better life. This 'class conscioussness' led directly to the General Strikes of 1925 and the struggle for social reform within the nation.
Slump
In the summer of 1920 the boom turned to a slump. Unemployment was becoming a problem and by 1921 reached two million. Cutbacks in the budget ensured around £100 million was taken from housing, education and social services. The slump in turn led to industrial unrest, especially in the coalfields. The Miner's federation voted to strike in support of its demands of nationalisation of the mines, which they assumed would produce higher wages and less managerial control. Eventually they went on strike after a wage cut and called for sympathy from railwaymen and transport workers. When this support was later withdrawn the Unions were defeated.
These problems were gradually making George less popular. The existence of the "Lloyd George Fund" added a taint of corruption to the mix. Without a political party or funds he sought to amass by private means funds to ensure his political future. This in turn led to the trading of honours for donations.[18]
Conservative bankbenchers were angry over the Anglo-Irish Treaty and awaited the opportunity to oust George. This came with the Chanak Crisis of 1922. A refusal by the Turks to accept the terms of the Treaty of Sévres led to George issuing an ultimatum before negotiations could begin. Angered by his responsibility for bringing the country to the brink of war, the Conservatives demanded an end to the postwar coalition. When they withdrew their support George resigned. Although he remained as leader of the Liberals from 1926 to 1931, he would never again hold political office.
Second World War
The powers of the central government increased dramatically. New departments were set up for a wide range of areas such as food, shipping and information. The Emergency Powers Acts of 1939 and 1940 gave the government wide powers of arrest. These were rarely used, and even Sir Oswald Mosley, Britain's leading fascist, was released from jail in 1943.
The postwar years(1945-2009)
The aftermath of war
British deaths from the Second World War numbered 393,000. Britain's economy suffered dreadfully, One quarter of the national wealth was spent on the war effort. The national debt tripled and two thirds of the export trade had been lost. Inflation had risen and the standard of living fallen. The Economist wrote, Our present needs are the direct consequence of the fact that we ought earliest, that we fought longest and that we fought hardest. [19]
The end of empire
Reform (3)
Egalitarianism after the war was a result of inter-class co-operation throughout the war. The victory of Clement Atlee's Labour Party and the radical social changes he promised were a testament to this. Liberal leader Sir William Beveridge wrote a report on Social Insurance in November, 1942 that was widely hailed and accepted by all parties. The "Beveridge report" promised a comprehensive scheme of social insurance from 'the cradle to the grave' against illness, unemployment and poverty. These adversities were to be overcome by the provision of social insurance for public health, free medical aid, unemployment insurance, improved housing and other reforming measures. There were to form the basis of the Welfare State. When the report was not given sufficient support by the wartime coalition, the greatest advocates of it - The Labour Party - staged the biggest parliamentary revolt of the 1940-1945 period. The Butler education Act of 1944, sponsored by the Conservatives, was of the same reforming nature as the Beveridge report. It raised the school leaving age to 15 and set up three types of free secondary education; grammar, technical and modern. All children sat the "11 plus" examination in order that the authorities could best decide what type of school best suited their abilities. In addition, nursery schools and schools for the handicapped were also established. Local authorities were to build schools and grant scholarships to provide greater access to higher education. There was also provision for school meals and improved medical services for children.
The welfare state
Search for growth
Decade of discontent
Return to stability
Crash of 2008
Recession
References
- ↑ See the link to a relevant website on the tutorials subpage
- ↑ RJO Hamblin: "The Geology of the English Channel", referred to in Norman Davis: The Isles, Macmillan 2000
- ↑ J.S. Cockburn, H.P.F. King, K.G.T. McDonnell (Editors): A History of the County of Middlesex., Volume 1 1969, British History Online.
- ↑ Stonehenge by The Megalithic Society
- ↑ Bernard Cornwell: Stonehenge, 2000 BC, Harper Collins, 1999
- ↑ Chris Scarre (ed) The Human Past, pp415-430, Thames & Hudson 2005
- ↑ The Silchester Excavations, The Insula IX Town Life Project
- ↑ Early Celtic or La Tène Art, British Museum 2009
- ↑ Wagons in Hallstatt Period: Its Technology and Use
- ↑ Norman Davies The Isles, Macmillan, 2000
- ↑ The Venerable Bede: The History of the English Church and People, 731, [1]
- ↑ David Debono: On how Reliable is Bede's Account of the Conversion of the Anglo-Saxons
- ↑ F.N. Lee: King Alfred the Great and our Common Law
- ↑ Frank Stenton: Anglo-Saxon England,pp 681-683, The Oxford History of England. Oxford University Press, 1971
- ↑ A L Poole: Domesday Book to Magna Carta,The Oxford History of England. Oxford University Press, 1954
- ↑ Trevor Wilson, The coupon and the British general election of 1918 Jstor
- ↑ Peter K. Cline, Reopening the case of the Lloyd George Coalition and the postwar economic transition 1918-1919 JSTOR
- ↑ Something similar would happen in the 'cash for peerages' scandal under Tony Blairs government early in the 21st century.
- ↑ Edward Fynes, European History, 1870-1966 (Dublin, 1999) p. 371