Talk:Cricket (sport): Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>John Stephenson (Mention on BBC blog) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Yes, looking good, John. I do think something about runs and what they are needs to be added to the first elementary exposition of the game. I didn't understand that first section until I read the "runs" section. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:01, 24 September 2007 (CDT) | Yes, looking good, John. I do think something about runs and what they are needs to be added to the first elementary exposition of the game. I didn't understand that first section until I read the "runs" section. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:01, 24 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Mention on BBC blog== | |||
BBC journalist Rory Cellan-Jones admits he has only a modest knowledge of cricket, but it might be useful to know that as a layperson he [http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2008/03/will_wikipedia_always_win.html finds the Wikipedia version of this article easier to read]. This is another article identifying CZ's number of articles as a problem. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:48, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:48, 1 April 2008
added subpage template
Hi John, good work here, though we Americans have a lot to learn on this one! I added the subpages template to your article for you. You are allowed to do this too, so if you ever need any help, just let me know and I'll walk you through it. Make sure and take a look at the metadata page and see if everything looks right to you. You can update it as the status changes with this article (ie once you add some wikilinks, ready for approval, etc.) --Matt Innis (Talk) 16:51, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
Yes, looking good, John. I do think something about runs and what they are needs to be added to the first elementary exposition of the game. I didn't understand that first section until I read the "runs" section. --Larry Sanger 09:01, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
Mention on BBC blog
BBC journalist Rory Cellan-Jones admits he has only a modest knowledge of cricket, but it might be useful to know that as a layperson he finds the Wikipedia version of this article easier to read. This is another article identifying CZ's number of articles as a problem. John Stephenson 02:48, 1 April 2008 (CDT)