Talk:Spherical harmonics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer |
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Spherical harmonics | |||
| cat1 = mathematics | |||
| cat2 = physics | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = | |||
| status = 1 | |||
| underlinked = yes | |||
| cleanup = | |||
| by = --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:58, 2 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
This article would definitely benefit from some images. [[User:Fredrik Johansson|Fredrik Johansson]] 11:04, 23 August 2007 (CDT) | This article would definitely benefit from some images. [[User:Fredrik Johansson|Fredrik Johansson]] 11:04, 23 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
* Although I am still working on this article (one of the things I want to do is type in explicit expressions), I had not planned any illustrations. I teak my lead from Whittaker and Watson: no diagrams :-) (joke). Do you have any suggestions? In the past I made some 3D-like plots of s, p, d, etc. orbitals (by means of Maple). They looked nice but, in my view, you don't learn anything from it.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 11:49, 23 August 2007 (CDT) | * Although I am still working on this article (one of the things I want to do is type in explicit expressions), I had not planned any illustrations. I teak my lead from Whittaker and Watson: no diagrams :-) (joke). Do you have any suggestions? In the past I made some 3D-like plots of s, p, d, etc. orbitals (by means of Maple). They looked nice but, in my view, you don't learn anything from it.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 11:49, 23 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 08:58, 2 September 2007
Workgroup category or categories | mathematics Workgroup, physics Workgroup [Please add or review categories] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | --Paul Wormer 09:58, 2 September 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This article would definitely benefit from some images. Fredrik Johansson 11:04, 23 August 2007 (CDT)
- Although I am still working on this article (one of the things I want to do is type in explicit expressions), I had not planned any illustrations. I teak my lead from Whittaker and Watson: no diagrams :-) (joke). Do you have any suggestions? In the past I made some 3D-like plots of s, p, d, etc. orbitals (by means of Maple). They looked nice but, in my view, you don't learn anything from it.--Paul Wormer 11:49, 23 August 2007 (CDT)
Illustrations?
As far as I'm concerned this article is finished. If somebody wants to make it more accessible by adding some graphs, please do so. --Paul Wormer 07:33, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
- I'm afraid I don't have any graphs to add myself. Those shown here are nice. There's also this image on Wikimedia Commons, which is free. Fredrik Johansson 08:38, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
- I uploaded Spher_harm_10.svg and tried to show it at the bottom of the article, but no luck! Can somebody tell me what I do wrong?--Paul Wormer 09:46, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Mathematics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Physics Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- Physics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Mathematics External Articles
- Physics External Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Physics Cleanup
- Cleanup