User talk:Mikael Häggström: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
imported>Mikael Häggström
Line 19: Line 19:


No explanation was necessary, Mikael.  But I don't know why you think there can't be two encyclopedias.  There are already very many, aren't there?  Can't humanity support more than one big wiki encyclopedia? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 03:34, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
No explanation was necessary, Mikael.  But I don't know why you think there can't be two encyclopedias.  There are already very many, aren't there?  Can't humanity support more than one big wiki encyclopedia? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 03:34, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
:Citizendium really is a well-planned project, and the articles created in it are truly reliable. However, with all due respect, I can not help thinking that the knowledge as well as the editors would benefit the world more if merged back to Wikipedia, making the corresponding articles featured and, if necessary, semi-protected. With an encyclopaedia with both credibility and quantity there would only need to be one. [[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]] 04:45, 25 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:45, 25 July 2007

[User bio is in User:Your Name]


Welcome

Citizendium Getting Started
Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians  


Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitionsadd metadata • edit new pages

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!

You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link CZ:Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.

Have fun and Happy editing!

--Matt Innis (Talk) 08:16, 22 July 2007 (CDT)

My inactivity so far

As of July 2007 I'm still rather inactive in my contribution to Citizendium. The reason is that I'm still considering whether my faith lies within Citizendium or Wikipedia. In fact, I'm a little bit sceptical to this whole project. I mean, it will never attract as many editors as Wikipedia, and therefore probably never will have the same amount of creation, scrutiny and editing of information. In contrast, it rather pulls the expertise away from the people. When people look for information they look at Wikipedia, because that's were they find everything (even the smallest piece of dust). Therefore I think isolation to an own little island of knowledge is letting the people down.

However, it is a beta version after all, so I'll wait and see. Mikael Häggström 03:30, 25 July 2007 (CDT)

No explanation was necessary, Mikael. But I don't know why you think there can't be two encyclopedias. There are already very many, aren't there? Can't humanity support more than one big wiki encyclopedia? --Larry Sanger 03:34, 25 July 2007 (CDT)

Citizendium really is a well-planned project, and the articles created in it are truly reliable. However, with all due respect, I can not help thinking that the knowledge as well as the editors would benefit the world more if merged back to Wikipedia, making the corresponding articles featured and, if necessary, semi-protected. With an encyclopaedia with both credibility and quantity there would only need to be one. Mikael Häggström 04:45, 25 July 2007 (CDT)